A geometrical pitfall of Area-Length method; -Is left ventricle volume evaluation of repaired Tetralogy of Fallot by angiocardiography accurate?

Abstract

Biplane Area-Length (AL) method by left ventriculography (LVG) has been widely adopted as a standard method to estimate left ventricular volume. However, we have experienced difficulties in adopting the value by AL method for the children with Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) due to the discrepancy among volumetric modalities. This study validated some limitations of AL method, considering the basic principles of its formulation. A single center retrospective cohort study was conducted for 1year. The confirmed 22 cases with repaired TOF at our hospital were enrolled. The clinical characteristics, some cardiac MRI analyses, and all the cardiac catheterization studies were collected. Angiographic data were compared with historic cohorts of Kawasaki disease without any coronary artery lesions by using AL method. Cardiac MRI analyses of ten TOF patients were additionally available. LVG studies showed that the length of the long axis on anteroposterior view (AP) was not equal to that on lateral view (LT) due to anatomically apical elevation in TOF, followed by a significant difference found in the sagittal lengths of the LV long axis between AP and LT (P = 0.003). Because the difference critically affected the formula depending on biplane AL method, the calculated LVEDV of TOF group appeared overestimated, compared with the control group (TOF vs control group: 119.5% ± 6.3% vs 96.4 ± 3.5% of Normal, P = 0.006). Available cardiac MRI analyses of some patients in TOF group revealed 55% increase of LVEDV by AL method (angiocardiography 116 ± 7.0 vs CMR 75 ± 3.7ml/m2, P = 0.0025). A pitfall exists when applying biplane AL method to measure LV volume especially for TOF patients, because the long axis on AP view is not always identical to that on LT view.