Abstract

Simple SummarySex estimation is a crucial step in the identification of unknown bone remains. The accuracy of sex estimation methods depends on the level of sexual dimorphism manifested by the human bones. Therefore, the evaluation of sex differences of particular bones of the skeleton is an important preceding stage. We have used geometric morphometric techniques to investigate the sexual dimorphism in the size and shape of the facial part of the skull and its subregions. Our results show that the facial skeleton in males and females differs more in size than in shape, so its overall size is a more useful sex indicator than its shape. The same result is observed for all facial subregions studied here. However, the best discrimination between the male and female skulls is achieved when both size and shape are considered together.The level of sexual dimorphism manifested by human bones is an important factor for development of effective sex estimation methods. The aim of the study was to investigate the sexual dimorphism in the size and shape of the viscerocranium using geometric morphometric techniques. It also aimed to explore the sex differences in distinct viscerocranial regions and to establish the most dimorphic region with regard to size and shape. Computed tomography images of 156 males and 184 females were used in the study. Three-dimensional coordinates of 31 landmarks were acquired. Five landmark configurations were constructed from the viscerocranium and its orbital, nasal, maxillary, and zygomatic region. Generalized Procrustes superimposition, principal component analysis, and discriminant analysis were applied to each configuration. The significance of the sex differences in size and shape was assessed and significant differences were found in all configurations. The highest accuracy was obtained from both shape and size of the whole viscerocranium. Based on size only, the highest accuracy was achieved by the nasal region. The accuracy based on shape was generally low for all configurations, but the highest result was attained by the orbital region. Hence, size is a better sex discriminator than shape.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.