Abstract

Potentially harmful stimuli occurring within the defensive peripersonal space (DPPS), a protective area surrounding the body, elicit stronger defensive reactions. The spatial features of the DPPS are poorly defined and limited to descriptive estimates of its extent along a single dimension. Here we postulated a family of geometric models of the DPPS, to address two important questions with respect to its spatial features: What is its fine-grained topography? How does the nervous system represent the body area to be defended? As a measure of the DPPS, we used the strength of the defensive blink reflex elicited by electrical stimulation of the hand (hand-blink reflex, HBR), which is reliably modulated by the position of the stimulated hand in egocentric coordinates. We tested the goodness of fit of the postulated models to HBR data from six experiments in which we systematically explored the HBR modulation by hand position in both head-centered and body-centered coordinates. The best-fitting model indicated that 1) the nervous system's representation of the body area defended by the HBR can be approximated by a half-ellipsoid centered on the face and 2) the DPPS extending from this area has the shape of a bubble elongated along the vertical axis. Finally, the empirical observation that the HBR is modulated by hand position in head-centered coordinates indicates that the DPPS is anchored to the face. The modeling approach described in this article can be generalized to describe the spatial modulation of any defensive response.

Highlights

  • THE DEFENSIVE PERIPERSONAL SPACE (DPPS) is a portion of space surrounding the body characterized by a protective function (Cooke and Graziano 2003; de Vignemont and Iannetti 2015)

  • It has been shown that 1) hand-blink reflex (HBR) magnitude does not linearly increase with the proximity between the stimulated hand and the eye, suggesting that the DPPS has relatively sharp boundaries, and 2) there are clear interindividual differences in its extension related to individual levels of anxiety

  • There was a significant difference in HBR magnitude between all positions (P Ͻ 0.001), except between the “ultra-far” and “far” positions (P ϭ 0.754)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

THE DEFENSIVE PERIPERSONAL SPACE (DPPS) is a portion of space surrounding the body characterized by a protective function (Cooke and Graziano 2003; de Vignemont and Iannetti 2015). This modulation is finely adjusted to ensure appropriate behavior, depending on high-level contextual factors, like the probability of stimulus occurrence and the presence of defensive objects close to the face (Sambo et al 2012a). The estimate of the individual DPPS shape was obtained with step models, in which there is no information about HBR strength in between the four stimulation positions This modeling approach does not allow making any predictions about the HBR response elicited by stimuli in spatial locations where no measurements were taken and cannot be used to derive a finer shape of the DPPS surrounding the face

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call