Abstract

In control engineering education, the possibility of using a real control system in the learning process motivates professors to improve both students’ knowledge and skills, thus avoiding an approach only based on control theory. While considering that control engineering laboratories are expensive, mainly because educational plants should reproduce classical problems that are found in the industry, the use of virtual laboratories appears as an interesting strategy for reducing costs and improving the diversity of experiments. In this research, remote experimentation was assumed regarding the ball and beam process as an alternative didactic methodology. While assuming a nonlinear and unstable open-loop process, this study presents how students should proceed to control the plant focusing on the topic that is associated with multiobjective optimization. Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controller was tuned considering the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) to illustrate the WebLab learning procedures described in this research. The proposed strategy was compared to the Åström’s robust loop shaping method to emphasize the performance of the multiobjective optimization technique. Analyzing the feedback provided by the students, remote experimentation can be seen as an interesting approach for the future of engineering learning, once it can be directly associated with industry demand of connected machines and real-time information analysis.

Highlights

  • The control engineering is an area of study where scientific and technological development supports the quality improvement of process and products, guarantying repeatability and precision in industrial applications

  • The Kalai–Smorodinsky solution (K-Ss) is the candidate solution in the point of intersection between a line connecting the points of disagreement and the utopian solution and the Pareto Front, and the Egalitarian solution (Es) is obtained through the intersection of a line, which started in the disagreement point and had an angle of 45 degrees, and the Pareto Front

  • Section associated with multiobjective optimization, and results that were obtained while applying

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The control engineering is an area of study where scientific and technological development supports the quality improvement of process and products, guarantying repeatability and precision in industrial applications. In this context, automatic control can be considered to be essential in many fields of science and engineering [1], e.g., electronics, chemistry, robotics, manufacturing systems, etc. The use of WebLabs in engineering education provides an alternative option to the inclusion of laboratory experiments during the teaching process In this approach, teaching laboratories are available on an online platform, where the students can perform their experiments at any time. Industries are considering WebLab during training activities, reducing the learning time and providing a remote evaluation of processes focusing on cost reduction [10]

Control Engineering Learning Involving the Ball and Beam Process
Related Works Associated with the Ball and Beam Modeling and Simulation
Related Works Associated with the Construction of the Ball and Beam Plant
Ball and Beampresents
The Ball and Beam Apparatus
Physical Modeling
Simplified Model
Full Model
PID Control and Performance Measures
Multiobjective Optimization Applied to Control Engineering
Multiobjective Problem Statement
Multiobjective Optimization Process
Multicriteria Decision Making
Experiment Structure
Procedures
2020, 11, 132 Procedures
Section 4.
Results
Optimization Procedures
Problem
Problem Definition
Multiobjective Optimization through NSGA-II
Multicriteria Decision Making Strategy
Controller’s gains
15. System
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call