Abstract

This work demonstrates a strategy for hybrid turbulence modeling that relies on parameters identifying flow structures to regulate the model's level of scale resolution, independent of the computational grid and user input. The approach can be classified as second-generation unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS), where it is assumed that increased scale resolution inside rapidly deformed turbulence regions can consistently reduce modeling error compared to basic URANS closures. The methodology selects flow structures by evaluating the second invariant of the velocity gradient tensor in the resolved field. The functions used for this purpose are similar to techniques applied in topology studies to identify coherent structures. The proposed formulation extends a baseline nonlinear eddy-viscosity URANS model and achieves completeness by means of a differential Lagrangian operator that approximates a locally computed average. The model addresses the lack of general applicability deriving from globally filtering at small scales by reverting to the baseline URANS in flow locations with low acceleration, in which the URANS solution achieves best accuracy. Three flow test cases are presented, demonstrating substantial accuracy enhancement over the baseline URANS on the same grid sizes. Results obtained with this new closure demonstrate robust applicability to internal flows, showing large-eddy simulation (LES)-like statistics on coarse RANS computational grids. The observed increase in computational cost compared to the baseline URANS is only 3% to 24%, which represents almost two orders of magnitude reduction from LES.

Highlights

  • The effectiveness of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of complex turbulent flows is still limited by the trade-off between accuracy and computational cost

  • The approach can be classified as second-generation unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS), where it is assumed that increased scale resolution inside rapidly deformed turbulence regions can consistently reduce modeling error compared to basic URANS closures

  • The approach aims at limiting a typical side-effect of hybrid models of over-resolving scales, which often results in a shift from an accurate solution to an unphysical model error being much larger than that expected from the baseline URANS.[23–27]

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The effectiveness of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of complex turbulent flows is still limited by the trade-off between accuracy and computational cost. Scitation.org/journal/phf prevent LES from becoming the standard simulation tool for complex turbulent flows in large industrial simulation domains.[5] Hybrid concepts have been proposed since the mid-1990s to bridge this simulation gap, starting with very-large-eddy simulation (VLES) by Speziale[6] and detached-eddy simulation (DES) by Spalart et al.[7] The two models modify the baseline URANS closure by activating scale-resolving features as a function of either grid size or wall distance. In both cases, the LES equations are not used directly, rather the models aim at reaching an LES-like behavior in hybrid activation zones. The STRUCT concept originally proposed by Lenci and Baglietto[36] has been tested by multiple authors,[38–48] who have proposed further variants

MODEL FORMULATION
General STRUCT closure concept
Controlled STRUCT formulation
STRUCT-T formulation
URANS-NLEVM formulation
A comment on the defensive strategy
LES-WALE formulation
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Numerical solver
Flow past a square cylinder
Turbulent mixing in a T-junction
Flow through an asymmetric diffuser
Discussion of results
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call