Abstract

Heat-assisted forming processes are becoming increasingly important in the manufacturing of sheet metal parts for body-in-white applications. However, the non-isothermal nature of these processes leads to challenges in evaluating the forming limits, since established methods such as Forming Limit Curves (FLCs) only allow the assessment of critical forming strains for steady temperatures. For this reason, a temperature-dependent extension of the well-established GISSMO (Generalized Incremental Stress State Dependent Damage Model) fracture indicator framework is developed by the authors to predict forming failures under non-isothermal conditions. In this paper, a general approach to combine several isothermal FLCs within the temperature-extended GISSMO model into a temperature-dependent forming limit surface is investigated. The general capabilities of the model are tested in a coupled thermo-mechanical FEA using the example of warm forming of an AA5182-O sheet metal cross-die cup. The obtained results are then compared with state of the art of evaluation methods. By taking the strain and temperature path into account, GISSMO predicts greater drawing depths by up to than established methods. In this way the forming and so the lightweight potential of sheet metal parts can by fully exploited. Moreover, the risk and locus of failure can be evaluated directly on the part geometry by a contour plot. An additional advantage of the GISSMO model is the applicability for low triaxialities as well as the possibility to predict the materials behavior beyond necking up to ductile fracture.

Highlights

  • Reducing vehicle weight offers remarkable opportunities for improving fuel economy and meeting global emissions regulations, regardless of the drivetrain concept [1]

  • An additional advantage of the Generalized Incremental Stress State Dependent Damage Model (GISSMO) model is the applicability for low triaxialities as well as the possibility to predict the materials behavior beyond necking up to ductile fracture

  • The risk of necking is evaluated in analogy to the temperature dependent 3D Forming Limit Diagram (FLD) method presented by Cui et al [18]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reducing vehicle weight offers remarkable opportunities for improving fuel economy and meeting global emissions regulations, regardless of the drivetrain concept [1]. High strength is usually associated with limited formability, which increases the demand for new manufacturing technologies that enable the drawing of high-strength and geometrically complex car body components. The ductility of both steel and aluminum sheet materials can be improved by warm and hot forming processes, which have been extensively investigated in recent years [2,3]. Since ductile fracture of sheet metals is often preceded by necking, the Forming Limit Diagram (FLD) asserted itself as an established post-processing approach for formability studies in finite element (FE) simulations of conventional stamping processes [5].

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call