Abstract

AbstractBecause of their limited spatial resolution, numerical weather prediction and climate models have to rely on parameterizations to represent atmospheric turbulence and convection. Historically, largely independent approaches have been used to represent boundary layer turbulence and convection, neglecting important interactions at the subgrid scale. Here we build on an eddy‐diffusivity mass‐flux (EDMF) scheme that represents all subgrid‐scale mixing in a unified manner, partitioning subgrid‐scale fluctuations into contributions from local diffusive mixing and coherent advective structures and allowing them to interact within a single framework. The EDMF scheme requires closures for the interaction between the turbulent environment and the plumes and for local mixing. A second‐order equation for turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) provides one ingredient for the diffusive local mixing closure, leaving a mixing length to be parameterized. Here, we propose a new mixing length formulation, based on constraints derived from the TKE balance. It expresses local mixing in terms of the same physical processes in all regimes of boundary layer flow. The formulation is tested at a range of resolutions and across a wide range of boundary layer regimes, including a stably stratified boundary layer, a stratocumulus‐topped marine boundary layer, and dry convection. Comparison with large eddy simulations (LES) shows that the EDMF scheme with this diffusive mixing parameterization accurately captures the structure of the boundary layer and clouds in all cases considered.

Highlights

  • Turbulence is ubiquitous in the planetary boundary layer

  • The mixing length formulation proposed in this study provides a regime‐independent closure of turbulent fluxes for eddy‐diffusivity mass‐flux (EDMF) schemes

  • In the stratocumulus‐topped boundary layer, where convective fluxes do play a role, the transport owing to environmental diffusion still provides the leading‐order contribution to the subgrid‐scale vertical fluxes in our EDMF scheme

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Turbulence is ubiquitous in the planetary boundary layer. Small‐scale chaotic air motions enhance mixing of energy and moisture in the lower troposphere. Turbulence and convection shape the vertical distribution of temperature and water vapor that sustains clouds These processes act on scales far too small to be resolved in global climate models (GCMs), with resolutions constrained by current computational power (Schneider et al, 2017). Conventional parameterizations consider atmospheric turbulence and convection as independent processes, neglecting interactions that alter their combined effect on the large scale These parameterizations are often regime dependent, leading to models that artificially split the spectrum of atmospheric conditions into a discrete number of cases.

EDMF Framework
Mixing Length Formulation
Minimum Dissipation of Environmental TKE
Limitations of the Minimum‐Dissipation Closure
Constrained Minimization of TKE Dissipation
Wall Constraints
Results for Single‐Column Simulations
Stable Boundary Layer
Stratocumulus‐Topped Boundary Layer
Dry Convection
Summary and Discussion
Data Availability Statement
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call