A general approach for developing a commercial micropropagation system

Abstract

Five distinct steps can be recognized in the establishment of a plant in a commercial micropropagation system, especially if the most utilized approach (shoot culture) is the focus. Failure at any one step can make the total system commercially unworkable. When one considers a plant without extensive previous history of microculture, the first step involves an analysis of the potential market (economic reality) as well as the plant’s general growth habit (biological reality). For the latter, the general growth habit of the plant can provide valuable predictive information as to the potential ease of microculture. For example, plants showing indeterminant herbaceous growth (e.g., Chrysanthemum, Solanum, Dieffenbachia) or continuous woody seasonal growth (e.g., Betula, Ulmus, Thuja) are generally much more amenable to microculture than those that are determinant herbaceous (e.g., Panix, Paeonia) or episodic woody organisms (e.g., Quercus, Pinus). At times, an episodic habitat can be overcome in microculture (Syringa, Rhododendron). The next four steps involve the actual manipulation and microculture of the plant and include the initiation, stabilization, optimization, and production phases. The most intensive analytical step is usually the optimization phase in which plant growth regulator response curves, replication, repetition through multiple subcultures, and evaluation of productivity and product quality are involved. The intent of this discussion is to help develop a decision tool to be used as a first approach to designing a potential new micropropagation system for an untested plant genotype.