Abstract

In conventional flowcytometry one detector (primary) is dedicated for one fluorochrome. However, photons usually end up in other detectors too (fluorescence spillover). ‘Compensation’ is a process that corrects the spillover signal from all detectors except the primary detector. Post ‘compensation’, the photon counting error of spillover signals become evident as spreading of the data. The spreading induced by spillover impairs the ability to resolve stained cell population from the unstained one, potentially reducing or completely losing cell populations. For successful multi-color panel design, it is important to know the expected spillover to maximize the data resolution. The Spillover Spreading Matrix (SSM) can be used to estimate the spread, but the outcome is dependent on detector sensitivity. Simply, the same single stained sample produces different spillover spread values when detector(s) sensitivity is altered. Many researchers mistakenly use this artifact to “reduce” the spread by decreasing detector sensitivity. This can result in diminished capacity to resolve dimly expressing cell populations. Here, we introduce SQI (Spread Quantification Index), that can quantify the spillover spread independent of detector sensitivity and independent of dynamic range. This allows users to compare spillover spread between instruments having different types of detectors, which is not possible using SSM.

Highlights

  • In conventional flowcytometry one detector is dedicated for one fluorochrome

  • The Spread Quantification Index (SQI) value is defined as the difference in median fluorescent intensity (MFI) between the 99th percentile and the 50th percentile in detector B, of the positive population of fluorochrome X (Fig. 1)

  • The main take home messages can be summarized as follows: 1. SQI values are unaffected by detector voltage/gain settings

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In conventional flowcytometry one detector (primary) is dedicated for one fluorochrome. Many researchers mistakenly use this artifact to “reduce” the spread by decreasing detector sensitivity This can result in diminished capacity to resolve dimly expressing cell populations. We introduce SQI (Spread Quantification Index), that can quantify the spillover spread independent of detector sensitivity and independent of dynamic range. This allows users to compare spillover spread between instruments having different types of detectors, which is not possible using SSM. For Immunophenotypic panels, spreading can decrease the detection sensitivity for low/dimly expressing antigens. Detectors like Photo Multiplier Tubes (PMTs) have been a stable choice for many manufacturers over many years These detectors are highly efficient at converting the light/incoming photons into photo electrons for detection. For designing a good panel, it is key to know how much spread can be expected in advance

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call