Abstract
Science and technology project evaluation is an important means of science and technology management. Whether the evaluation of science and technology projects is fair or not directly affects the development of national economy and the allocation of science and technology resources. Due to the complexity of the project and the fuzziness of human thinking, the expert information is often difficult to quantify in the process of project evaluation. Generally, the better choice is to express it in qualitative language. In this paper, the 2-tuple linguistic preference relation is proposed to evaluate scientific research projects. The reasonableness of the concept of complete consistency for the 2-tuple linguistic preference relation is discussed. Priority of 2-tuple linguistic preference relation is set up based on the 2-tuple weighted geometric averaging operator. Finally, combined with Science and technology project evaluation problem, the effectiveness and feasibility of the method are verified.
Highlights
Science and technology project initiation and evaluation is an important part of science and technology project management
Zhu [4] proposed a project evaluation method for non-formatted Chinese text evaluation information based on multi-granular linguistic labels
In the actual decision-making process, due to the fuzziness and diversity of science and technology project evaluation information, each expert's personal preference, professional status and authority are not exactly the same and other factors, it is impossible for experts to express different projects with certain values when comparing them
Summary
Science and technology project initiation and evaluation is an important part of science and technology project management. Project initiation review is one of the core links of science and technology project evaluation It is generally carried out in accordance with the procedures of preliminary review form review, peer expert communication review, comprehensive treatment of writing comprehensive review opinions, and discipline review meeting review. In the actual decision-making process, due to the fuzziness and diversity of science and technology project evaluation information, each expert's personal preference, professional status and authority are not exactly the same and other factors, it is impossible for experts to express different projects with certain values when comparing them. It is usually expressed in fuzzy language evaluation.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
