Abstract

Simple SummaryInterventions that aim to increase well-being among detained juveniles, in addition to interventions focusing on behavioral change, are urgently needed and should be increasingly implemented. A promising and popular intervention is the prison-based dog training program. In such a program, detainees train shelter dogs to prepare them for adoption. In literature about these interventions, it is often assumed that the perceived bond with the dog plays an important role in improving well-being among detainees. For example, it is assumed to decrease stress and increase self-esteem. However, the human–animal bond within a prison-based dog training program and its effects are seldom investigated. In this study, we investigated to what extent the human–animal bond predicts stress and self-esteem among detained juveniles, participating in a prison-based dog training program in the Netherlands (Dutch Cell Dogs). Questionnaires and interviews at several timepoints were used to measure the quality of the human–animal bond, and the perceived reciprocity, stress, and self-esteem. The results of this study show that the human–animal bond did not predict lower stress or higher self-esteem, contrary to our expectations. More research on prison-based dog training programs is needed to investigate how these programs work, and the specific role of the human–animal bond within these programs.This study examined to what extent the human–animal bond (HAB) had a positive impact on stress and self-esteem among detained juveniles participating in the prison-based dog training program Dutch Cell Dogs (DCD). Participants were 75 detained juveniles (mean age = 19.5, 86.7% male). Self-reported stress and self-esteem were assessed before the start of DCD (T1), after four weeks (halfway training/T2) and after eight weeks (end training/T3). Structured interviews and questionnaire items were used to measure the HAB quality and perceived reciprocity in the HAB at T2 and T3. Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling. In the variable-centered approach analyses, only the cross-sectional positive association between HAB quality and self-esteem at T2 was significant in the cross-lagged panel models. None of the cross-lagged paths between the HAB and stress or self-esteem were significant. In the person-centered approach analyses, growth mixture modeling identified two patterns of self-esteem (“high stable” and “high decreasing”); however, these patterns were not predicted by HAB. Thus, in contrast to our hypotheses, the HAB did not predict improvements in detained juveniles’ stress and self-esteem. These findings underline the need for more research into the often-presumed role of HAB within prison-based dog training programs.

Highlights

  • Detained juveniles represent a high-risk, vulnerable population [1]

  • The present study was one of the first addressing the role of Prison Based Dog Program (PBDP)’s underlying mechanisms, by aiming to answer the question: To what extent does the human–animal bond (HAB) have a positive impact on stress and self-esteem among detained juveniles participating in Dutch Cell Dogs (DCD)?

  • This study demonstrated that the HAB in DCD did not predict detained juveniles’ stress or self-esteem

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Detained juveniles represent a high-risk, vulnerable population [1]. Being detained has been associated with several adverse outcomes, such as loneliness and depression [2,3].The prevalence of mental health disorders among detained juveniles is alarmingly high: 60 to 70 percent meets the diagnostic criteria for at least one mental health disorder [4,5]. Detained juveniles represent a high-risk, vulnerable population [1]. One promising intervention to improve well-being of detained juveniles is the Prison Based Dog Program (PBDP). In PBDPs, dogs are included to improve wellbeing and stimulate positive behavioral change in detainees [8]. In the community-service Dog-Training Program (DTP), detainees train behaviorally challenging shelter dogs to prepare them for adoption [9]. These programs are unique in providing detainees with opportunities to be responsible and caring [9]. In contrast to many other prison-based interventions, the main focus of these programs is on helping the dog, instead of on the detainees [10]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call