Abstract

Governments and consumer advocacy groups have placed considerable pressure on fashion companies to reduce their harmful impact on the environment and to make an effort toward improving social justice throughout the world. Consequently, many companies are striving to shift their business practices toward sustainability and to meet the requested standards of corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives to transform the fashion industry. Depending on the degree of deviation, employees may perceive sustainable corporations’ CSR initiatives inconsistently. This could also lead to negative effects on consumers’ perceptions of CSR efforts when there is a gap in perception between the stakeholders. Therefore, this study aimed to suggest a new framework of perceived CSR performance by exploring consumers’ and employees’ evaluations of CSR initiatives. To explore consumers’ and employees’ evaluations of CSR initiatives, H&M and Nike were selected. Given that Nike employees (internal) perceived a high CSR performance while consumers (external) perceived a lower CSR performance for Nike, it might be that Nike is successfully communicating and executing their CSR initiatives to their employees, but not as well to consumers, suggesting that Nike is under-marketing their CSR efforts.

Highlights

  • Stakeholder theory calls for a focus on social issues in management that require companies to meet the approval of prominent stakeholders, including both internal and external (Sharma & Henriques, 2005)

  • To explore consumers’ and employees’ evaluations of corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives, H&M and Nike were selected as the two focal brands since they are highly focused on their sustainability initiatives and practices

  • The results showed that employees of Nike perceived a higher level of CSR performance for Nike than did H&M’s employees for H&M (MNike=5.64, MH&M= 5.29)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Stakeholder theory calls for a focus on social issues in management that require companies to meet the approval of prominent stakeholders, including both internal (owners, employees, and suppliers) and external (governments, consumers, environmentalists, and the media) (Sharma & Henriques, 2005). More and more consumers expect firms to have a commitment to CSR initiatives, and they evaluate companies as well as products in terms of how well they are meeting their CSR goals (Oberseder et al, 2013). Depending on the degree of deviation, employees may perceive sustainable corporations’ CSR initiatives inconsistently, which may affect their responses and their decision-making processes related to organizations’ CSR efforts (Rupp et al, 2013).

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call