Abstract

AbstractWith the emergence of non‐hydrostatic global dynamical cores, an alternative testing strategy is proposed, where the planetary radius is suitably reduced to capture non‐hydrostatic phenomena without incurring the computational cost of actual simulations of weather and climate at non‐hydrostatic resolution. The procedure is simple and tests various aspects of the discretized hydrostatic and non‐hydrostatic equations in the same setting on a sphere. Furthermore, it facilitates verification against Cartesian‐domain analytic solutions and against large‐eddy simulation (LES) benchmarks available for limited‐area models. The proposed framework is illustrated with examples of inertia–gravity wave dynamics in linear and nonlinear regimes, including flows past idealized mountains, stratified shear flows and critical layers. Finally, an intercomparison of the Held–Suarez climate variability for reduced‐size planets is presented, which provides a path for future investigations on the dynamics of convective boundary layers on a sphere. This assesses the ability to adequately capture interactions of large‐scale dynamics with intermittent turbulent structures, an important aspect of future weather and climate predictions. Copyright © 2009 Royal Meteorological Society

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.