Abstract

Abstract Abstract The exclusive use of discounted cash flow (DCF) capital budgeting models is being criticized because of the inability of these models to handle qualitative/intangible benefits and tie the capital budgeting decision formally to organizational strategy. In response, several authors have recently proposed the use of Saaty's Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for capital investment analysis. This paper extends that line of research by focusing on the fundamental problem of structuring the decision hierarchy appropriately so that the AHP can be implemented successfully in a capital budgeting context. Three approaches are presented for structuring AHP hierarchies, including the Mission, Objectives, and Strategy (MOS) framework for strategic planning. An example based on three actual companies in the petrochemical industry is developed using the MOS approach.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.