Abstract

We describe a framework for proving consistency results about singular cardinals of arbitrary cofinality and their successors. This framework allows the construction of models in which the Singular Cardinals Hypothesis fails at a singular cardinal κ \kappa of uncountable cofinality, while κ + \kappa ^+ enjoys various combinatorial properties. As a sample application, we prove the consistency (relative to that of ZFC plus a supercompact cardinal) of there being a strong limit singular cardinal κ \kappa of uncountable cofinality where SCH fails and such that there is a collection of size less than 2 κ + 2^{\kappa ^+} of graphs on κ + \kappa ^+ such that any graph on κ + \kappa ^+ embeds into one of the graphs in the collection.

Highlights

  • The class of uncountable regular cardinals is naturally divided into three disjoint classes: the successors of regular cardinals, the successors of singular cardinals and the weakly inaccessible cardinals

  • When we consider a combinatorial question about uncountable regular cardinals, typically these classes require separate treatment and very frequently the successors of singular cardinals present the hardest problems

  • To give some context for our work, we review a standard strategy for proving consistency results about the successors of regular cardinals

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The class of uncountable regular cardinals is naturally divided into three disjoint classes: the successors of regular cardinals, the successors of singular cardinals and the weakly inaccessible cardinals. Λ κ Cohen forcing to add many subsets of a regular cardinal , which we denote by Add(κ, λ), is the collection of partial functions of size less than κ from λ to 2, Fn(λ, 2, κ), ordered by reverse inclusion. The ordering is that p = (tp, f p) ≤ q = (tq, f q) t t if q is obtained by, in Kunen's [15] vivid précis, `sawing o p parallel to the ground': i.e. there is some α < κ+ such that tq = tp ∩ α2, dom(f q) ⊆ dom(f p) and f q(ξ)

Some iterated forcing theory
Preserving diamond under forcing
Radin forcing
The main iteration
Proof that we do get small universal families
E E that ε α and ε β are coherent for α
E E Next we show that ε α and ε β cohere for α
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call