Abstract
Retrofitting of industrial heat recovery systems can contribute significantly to meeting energy efficiency targets for industrial plants. One issue to consider when screening retrofit design proposals is that industrial heat recovery systems must be able to handle variations, e.g., in inlet temperatures or heat capacity flow rates, in such a way that operational targets are reached. Consequently, there is a need for systematic retrofitting methodologies that are applicable to multi-period heat exchanger networks (HENs). In this study, a framework was developed to achieve flexible and cost-efficient retrofit measures of (industrial) HENs. The main idea is to split the retrofitting processes into several sub-steps. This splitting allows well-proven (single period) retrofit methodologies to be used to generate different design proposals, which are collected in a superstructure. By means of structural feasibility assessment, structurally infeasible design proposals can be discarded from further analysis, yielding a reduced superstructure. Additionally, critical point analysis is applied to identify those operating points within the uncertainty span that determine necessary overdesign of heat exchangers. In the final step, the most cost-efficient design proposal within the reduced superstructure is identified. The proposed framework was applied to a HEN retrofit case study to illustrate the proposed framework.
Highlights
After the Paris Agreement 2015, decarbonization of industry and energy-intensive industrial processes has been proposed as one of the key measures to limit the increase of the global average temperature well below 2 ◦ C
In contrast to the results reported by Persson and Berntsson as well as the excessive amount of methodologies available for retrofitting single-period heat exchanger networks (HENs), little attention has been paid to HEN retrofit methodologies that account for variations and uncertainties in operating data
The proposed framework divides the retrofit design process into five sub-steps, which allows for the combining of the beneficial designer interaction of graphical approaches (e.g., Pinch based) at an early stage in the design process with the efficiency of mathematical programming to derive flexible and cost-efficient retrofit measures
Summary
After the Paris Agreement 2015, decarbonization of industry and energy-intensive industrial processes has been proposed as one of the key measures to limit the increase of the global average temperature well below 2 ◦ C. Systematic approaches to design and synthesize heat recovery systems, especially heat exchanger networks (HENs), have been subject to research since the early 1980s with the introduction of the graphical Pinch analysis method [1]. In addition to the graphical Pinch analysis method, mathematical programming has been well established as a complementary approach to HEN synthesis. Both sequential approaches [2] and simultaneous approaches [3], where targeting and network synthesis are performed separately and simultaneously, respectively, have been developed and reported in the literature. Axelsson et al [5], Bengtsson et al [6], as well as Escobar and Trierweiler [7] have applied graphical and mathematical methods to case studies, including industrial applications, and reported results and comparisons
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
