Abstract

In this second part of a two-part study, we extend to nonlinear synaptic responses a new framework, called Response Surfaces (RSs), for analyzing, designing, and visualizing spiking neurons and networks. An RS is the transfer function between input and output firing times of a spiking neuron and shows all the patterns of input spike times that fire a neuron at a given time. Here in Part II, we present four mathematically tractable functions to model more realistic post-synaptic-potential waveforms, and we build on the linear RS framework of Part I to create a nonlinear RS framework. We then discuss the qualitative differences between the linear and nonlinear RSs frameworks and revisit problems of Part I using the nonlinear RSs framework: graphing the transfer function of a nonlinear spiking neuron, designing an efficient spiking-XOR gate, analyzing phase-tracking in recurrent SNNs, and developing transfer functions for calculating the output firing times of a spiking neuron given a set of input firing times. For the nonlinear RS framework, we show that the output firing time of a nonlinear spiking neuron is equivalent to the center-of-mass of input spike times (acting as positions) and weights (acting as masses) plus a fixed delay plus a second-order correction. The second-order centroid correction is one of the main differences between the linear and nonlinear RS frameworks. For recurrent networks, the nonlinear RS framework also shows a more stable behavior compared to linear SNNs, owing to the smooth shapes of nonlinear post-synaptic-potential waveforms.

Highlights

  • Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs), as exemplified by the brain, are of great interest owing to their potentials for performing complex tasks such as pattern- and speechrecognition [1,2,3,4,5,6] with a low power-consumption.The challenge in realizing the potential of SNNs lies in their complexity

  • To understand how more bio-realistic spiking neurons use the detailed timing of spikes, in this paper we extend the Linear SRM" (LSRM) neuron to the Nonlinear Spike Response Model (SRM) (NSRM) using more realistic Nonlinear PSPs (NPSPs)

  • Since the ideas and definitions we present for the LSRM are relevant to NSRM models, this review forms a foundation for the derivation of the NSRMs

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs), as exemplified by the brain, are of great interest owing to their potentials for performing complex tasks such as pattern- and speechrecognition [1,2,3,4,5,6] with a low power-consumption. LINEAR SPIKE RESPONSE MODEL REVIEW A challenging problem in the LSRM, and in general in spiking neuron models, is to derive a transfer function that maps input-spike times to exact output spike times rather than averaging or blurring timing information. Each c-region envelopes possible patterns of input spike times firing an output spike at t = 0, and each c-region corresponds to a different combination of synaptic slopes or c-values, each of which has three possible states: rising, falling, or idle. See [19] for a full discussion of LRSs and their properties

NONLINEAR SPIKE RESPONSE MODEL
NONLINEAR RESPONSE SURFACE EXAMPLES
NON-ZERO OUTPUT FIRING TIME
XOR DESIGN PROCESS
PHASE TRACKING IN RECURRENT SNNS
GENERATION AND VALIDATION OF RESULTS
CONCLUSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.