Abstract
BackgroundA frailty paradigm would be useful in primary care to identify older people at risk, but appropriate metrics at that level are lacking. We created and validated a simple instrument for frailty screening in Europeans aged ≥50. Our study is based on the first wave of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE, http://www.share-project.org), a large population-based survey conducted in 2004-2005 in twelve European countries.MethodsSubjects: SHARE Wave 1 respondents (17,304 females and 13,811 males). Measures: five SHARE variables approximating Fried's frailty definition. Analyses (for each gender): 1) estimation of a discreet factor (DFactor) model based on the frailty variables using LatentGOLD®. A single DFactor with three ordered levels or latent classes (i.e. non-frail, pre-frail and frail) was modelled; 2) the latent classes were characterised against a biopsychosocial range of Wave 1 variables; 3) the prospective mortality risk (unadjusted and age-adjusted) for each frailty class was established on those subjects with known mortality status at Wave 2 (2007-2008) (11,384 females and 9,163 males); 4) two web-based calculators were created for easy retrieval of a subject's frailty class given any five measurements.ResultsFemales: the DFactor model included 15,578 cases (standard R2 = 0.61). All five frailty indicators discriminated well (p < 0.001) between the three classes: non-frail (N = 10,420; 66.9%), pre-frail (N = 4,025; 25.8%), and frail (N = 1,133; 7.3%). Relative to the non-frail class, the age-adjusted Odds Ratio (with 95% Confidence Interval) for mortality at Wave 2 was 2.1 (1.4 - 3.0) in the pre-frail and 4.8 (3.1 - 7.4) in the frail. Males: 12,783 cases (standard R2 = 0.61, all frailty indicators had p < 0.001): non-frail (N = 10,517; 82.3%), pre-frail (N = 1,871; 14.6%), and frail (N = 395; 3.1%); age-adjusted OR (95% CI) for mortality: 3.0 (2.3 - 4.0) in the pre-frail, 6.9 (4.7 - 10.2) in the frail.ConclusionsThe SHARE Frailty Instrument has sufficient construct and predictive validity, and is readily and freely accessible via web calculators. To our knowledge, SHARE-FI represents the first European research effort towards a common frailty language at the community level.
Highlights
A frailty paradigm would be useful in primary care to identify older people at risk, but appropriate metrics at that level are lacking
Frailty confers loss of independence, vulnerability and impairs the quality of life and psychological well-being of many older people; it poses an enormous challenge on families, carers and other structures of social
Defining frailty requires a complex systems approach [2] and, in general, it is accepted that a good definition should capture the biological, and the psychosocial correlates of frailty [14]
Summary
A frailty paradigm would be useful in primary care to identify older people at risk, but appropriate metrics at that level are lacking. We created and validated a simple instrument for frailty screening in Europeans aged ≥50. In part due to its syndromic nature, and despite considerable research efforts in the field, an operational definition of frailty that meets international consensus is still lacking [8,9,10,11,12,13]. Numerous frailty definitions and assessment tools have been developed in clinical practice and research, and this has been the focus of many reviews and comparative studies [3,16,17,18,19,20]. The method has been extensively validated in the research literature [23,24,25]; a criticism is that it is not readily applicable in routine primary care practice
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have