Abstract
SummaryThe spatial resolution of sensory systems is not homogeneous across their receptive surfaces. For example, tactile acuity is greatest on the fingertips, reflecting the high innervation density and small mechanoreceptive fields in this area [1, 2]. In contrast, pain is considered to lack any equivalent to the tactile fovea on the fingertips, where the density of nociceptive fibers is remarkably low [3]. Here, by combining psychophysics with histology, we show that this established notion is incorrect. By delivering small-diameter nociceptive-specific laser pulses to human volunteers, we discovered that (1) the spatial acuity for pain is higher on the fingertips than on proximal skin regions such as the hand dorsum, and (2) this distal-proximal gradient for pain is comparable to that for touch. In contrast, skin biopsies in the same participants showed that the intraepidermal nerve fiber density is lower in the fingertips than in the hand dorsum. The increased spatial acuity for pain on the fingertips therefore cannot be explained simply by peripheral innervation density. This finding is, however, consistent with the existence of fine-grained maps of nociceptive input to individual digits in the human primary somatosensory cortex [4].Video
Highlights
Psychophysical Evidence of High Spatial Resolution for Pain on the Fingertips In a psychophysical experiment, we compared the spatial resolution for pain and touch on the fingertips and on the hand dorsum
The mean of the fitted Gaussian estimates the point of subjective equality (PSE)
A high just-noticeable difference (JND) corresponds to poor spatial resolution
Summary
A 2 3 2 factorial design with modality (pain and touch) and skin region (fingertip and dorsum) was used in the psychophysical experiment. Stimuli were delivered in two separate sessions. Stimuli were delivered either to the volar surface of the fingertip or to the hand dorsum. The order of sessions was counterbalanced across participants. We stimulated different locations on the center of the hand dorsum, within a 4 3 3 cm region. The number of blocks per session was 14 (seven blocks for each sensory modality), and the order of blocks was counterbalanced across participants. We delivered ten pairs of spatially separated stimuli. The spatial separations were 7, 5, 3, 2, and 1 mm on the fingertip and 16, 12, 8, 4, and 2 mm on the hand dorsum. The total number of stimulus pairs per participant was 280
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.