Abstract
System configuration languages are now widely used to drive the deployment and evolution of large computing infrastructures. Most such languages are highly informal, making it difficult to reason about configurations, and introducing an important source of failure. We claim that a more rigorous approach to the development and specification of these languages will help to avoid these difficulties and bring a number of additional benefits. In order to test this claim, we present a formal semantics for the core of the SmartFrog configuration language. We demonstrate how this can be used to prove important properties such as termination of the compilation process. To show that this also contributes to the practical development of clear and correct compilers, we present three independent implementations, and verify their equivalence with each other, and with the semantics. Supported by an extended example from a real configuration scenario, we demonstrate how the process of developing the semantics has improved understanding of the language, highlighted problem areas, and suggested alternative interpretations. This leads us to advocate this approach for the future development of practical configuration languages.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
