Abstract

Social norms influence IYCF practices in all cultures. Challenges remain in studying social norms and tracking them over time. We used an ethnographic tool, free‐listing, to assess socially normative IYCF patterns in the context of a process evaluation of a BCC intervention. Groups of 3–4 women in 90 households in 3 sub‐districts listed all foods usually given to children from 0–24mo and reasons for giving each food. Data on normative age of introduction were analyzed in Stata; text data were analyzed in NVivo. Intervention exposure (IE) was viewing a TV spot, a visit by a frontline health‐worker (FHW), or both. Data analysis captured overall social norms, and by intervention exposure. Under 6mo, breast milk was highly normative (94%), but prelacteals (water (58.9%), sugar‐water (36.7%), honey (43.3%)) were also normative, for ritualistic, cultural and pacifying reasons. Cow's milk and “tinned milk” were normative (76.7%; 1.7 ±2.3 mo & 70.0%; 2.9± 3.6 mo), as was rice gruel (83.3%; 4.7 ± 2.7 mo), and were linked to perceptions of infant need and insufficient breast milk. Fewer households with full IE mentioned breast milk‐substitutes, prelacteals, and cow's milk as early foods. The results highlight that although some BCC recommendations are influencing normative practices, entrenched norms may hamper impact. Support: Alive & Thrive, funded by Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation & managed by FHI360; NIH (5T32HD007331).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.