Abstract

ABSTRACT In recent years, there has been an increase in work on urban informality in Northern cities. While this newfound focus is welcome, a problem arises when it comes to conceptualizing various practices under study. Specifically, I argue for the importance in differentiating the informality of need – defined here as practices undertaken to fulfill basic needs like housing and income generation – from the informality of desire – defined as activities that serve interests of leisure, aesthetics, and convenience. Using the case of the Red Hook food vendors in Brooklyn, New York, I show how ignoring needs can lead to imprecise conceptualizations, misunderstood intentions, and misread political subjectivity when it comes to informal actions. I move on to show how existing theories concerning informality in the North fail to provide tools for understanding the specific characteristics of needs-based informal practice. I close the paper by arguing that need-driven informality deserves its own set of conceptual tools, and I determine that by turning to Southern theory on informality and inequality, Northern scholars can open helpful new pathways for theory.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.