Abstract

The comparison between the optimal sequential and repeated fixed-size sample (FSS) strategies in the problem of abrupt change detection and isolation is discussed. The general case of non-orthogonal Gaussian hypotheses is considered. Each hypothesis is characterized by its mean vector (the change signature) and it is desirable to detect/isolate a change subject to the constraints on a pre-assigned time between false alarm and a maximum probability of false isolation. It is established that the performance of the proposed FSS algorithm is directly related to the mutual geometry between the hypotheses through the Kullback–Leibler information. This algorithm is less efficient than an optimal sequential one but in contrast to the sequential strategy, the FSS strategy can be easily used for monitoring in the case of variable structure systems.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.