Abstract

(1) Introduction: Medical malpractice claims against both health institutions and physicians are a crucial topic in Italy, as well as in other countries, particularly regarding civil proceedings. Our study reports an analysis of all of the malpractice judgments concerning plastic surgery decided in the Civil Court of Rome between 2012 and 2016. (2) Methods: the database of the Observatory Project on Medical Responsibility (ORMe) was analyzed, which collects all of the judgments of the Civil Court of Rome, that is, the first instance district court. Therefore, neither the jurisprudence of the second level court nor that of the Supreme Court was taken into account. (3) Results: 144 judgments concerning plastic surgery were delivered in the five-year period of 2012–2016 (corresponding to 10.6% of total professional liability verdicts of the Civil Court of Rome in the same period). In 101/144 cases (70.14%), the claim was accepted. A total of €4,727,579.00 was paid in compensation for plastic surgery malpractice claims, with a range from a minimum amount of €1555.96 to a maximum amount of €1,425,155.00 and an average compensation of €46,807.71 per claim that was significantly lower compared to other surgical disciplines. (4) Conclusions: Our data confirm that the analyzed branch has a high litigation rate, with a prevalence of convictions for cosmetic procedures over reconstructive ones, both for malpractice and for violation of the informed consent. Plastic surgery is also confirmed among those branches in which the professionals are more frequently sued compared to health institutions.

Highlights

  • Medical malpractice claims against both health institutions and physicians are a crucial topic in Italy, as well as in other countries, regarding civil proceedings.With this regard, the European Academy of Legal Medicine (EALM) in 2013 proposed the European Guidelines on Medico-Legal Methods of Ascertainment and Evaluation Criteria in cases of suspected subjective medical responsibility and/or liability [1]

  • Plastic surgery is confirmed among those branches in which the professionals are more frequently sued compared to health institutions

  • Our data confirm that plastic surgery has a high litigation rate, with a prevalence of convictions for cosmetic procedures over reconstructive ones, both for malpractice and for violation of informed consent

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Medical malpractice claims against both health institutions and physicians are a crucial topic in Italy, as well as in other countries, regarding civil proceedings. With this regard, the European Academy of Legal Medicine (EALM) in 2013 proposed the European Guidelines on Medico-Legal Methods of Ascertainment and Evaluation Criteria in cases of suspected subjective medical responsibility and/or liability [1]. Several years are needed to have evidence about the effects of this law from its entry into force; it can be useful for an analysis on medical malpractice claims to highlight the effective pressure on sanitary systems, as well as to have an overview of the costs of health malpractice compensation. Tarantino et al [4] reported about malpractice judgments concerning orthopedics decided in the Civil Court of Rome between 2004 and 2010, analyzing

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call