Abstract

Eucalyptus gunnii is a fast-growing, cold-tolerant tree species endemic to Tasmania that is suitable for growing as short-rotation coppice (SRC) plantations in the UK. Fast growing eucalypts such as E. gunnii could potentially deliver higher biomass yields with a superior calorific value for the domestic bioenergy market than other SRC plantation species such as willow or poplar. However, eucalypts are known emitters of biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOC) like isoprene and monoterpenes. These compounds contribute to the formation of atmospheric pollutants such as ozone and secondary organic aerosols. An assessment of the sources of BVOCs during the lifecycle of a UK E. gunnii SRC plantation found the mean standardised emissions of isoprene and total monoterpenes from branches of juvenile foliage to be 7.50 μg C gdw−1 h−1 and 1.30 μg C gdw−1 h−1, respectively. The predominant monoterpene emitted was cis-β-ocimene. Isoprene emissions from the forest floor were extremely low but monoterpene emissions peaked at 50 μg C m−2 h−1. α-Pinene and d-limonene were the major components of the monoterpene emissions, with higher emissions correlated to the abundance of leaf litter. Both the magnitude and composition of monoterpene emissions from the forest floor varied during the SRC plantation life cycle, with the coppiced and regrowth stands of eucalyptus producing less emissions. The woodchip produced at harvesting emitted only trace levels of isoprene but substantial monoterpene emissions, up to 90 μg C m−2 h−1, predominately eucalyptol. Harvesting and resulting biomass chips may provide a short-lived concentrated source of BVOCs in winter at SRC plantations. Modelled annual emissions using MEGAN 2.1 (canopy emissions only) suggest that BVOC emissions from a UK E. gunnii SRC plantation are most abundant in summer, and that modelled annual isoprene and total monoterpenes emissions could be around 6.9 kg C ha−1 and 2.4 kg C ha−1 respectively, for a young plantation. Based on the very limited data, the per-hectare E. gunnii isoprene emissions are smaller than estimates for other SRC/SRF plantation species in the UK; the per-hectare monoterpene emissions are in the span of estimates for other plantation species.

Highlights

  • Eucalypt plantations have seen renewed interest as a potential source of biomass for the production of bioenergy in the UK and Ireland (Leslie et al, 2020; Leslie and Purse, 2016; Purse and Leslie, 2016)

  • Based on the very limited data, the per-hectare E. gunnii isoprene emissions are smaller than estimates for other short-rotation coppice (SRC)/short-rotation forest (SRF) plantation species in the UK; the per-hectare monoterpene emis­ sions are in the span of estimates for other plantation species

  • The standardised isoprene emissions from juvenile foliage of different branches of 18 individual trees measured across two consec­ utive days with similar weather in 2020 ranged between 0.6 and 24.0 μg C gd− w1 h− 1 (Fig. 5a). (The mean temperature and photosynthetic active radi­ ation (PAR) during sampling on these two days were 24.8 ◦C and 27.3 ◦C, and 994 μmol m− 2 s− 1 and 683 μmol m− 2 s− 1, respectively.) The mean (± standard deviation) of the 18 individual standardised isoprene emissions is 9.4 ± 8.2 μg C gd− w1 h− 1

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Eucalypt plantations have seen renewed interest as a potential source of biomass for the production of bioenergy in the UK and Ireland (Leslie et al, 2020; Leslie and Purse, 2016; Purse and Leslie, 2016). Planting trials for several eucalypt species were established in the UK for this purpose (Evans, 1980; Harrison, 2010; Leslie and Purse, 2016; Purse and Leslie, 2016; Tobin et al, 2016) and commercial eucalypt planta­ tions grown for floristry or biomass are gaining interest (Capurro, 2019; Elliott, 2018; Vergnault, 2019). The most widely planted species of eucalypt across the UK is Eucalyptus gunnii, which, as well as being planted in parks and private gardens, has been grown in short-rotation forest (SRF) trials across Great Britain (Harrison, 2010) and as a commercial biomass plantation

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call