Abstract

In a previous study, models of the crust and magma chamber at 12°50′N on the East Pacific Rise were derived with a two‐dimensional ray‐tracing analysis of rise‐normal refraction lines. The best model featured a 4 km wide axial magma chamber, but the data contained diffraction effects that were not modeled by geometric ray theory. This raised questions as to whether this model would reproduce the waveform data and whether diffraction might be obscuring a much larger magma chamber. We have tested the model with a finite element calculation of synthetic seismograms. This method incorporates full wave effects, including diffraction. The synthetics accurately reproduce the data and exhibit diffraction phenomena similar to those in the data. The previous travel time analysis was largely successful and was only slightly compromised by diffraction. Diffraction in rise‐normal refraction experiments is, therefore, not obscuring a large, low velocity magma chamber.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.