A Field Trial to Assess Asphaltene Related Production Impairment—Marrat Reservoir, Magwa Field, Kuwait

Abstract

Abstract Asphaltene deposition in the reservoir, wellbore and facilities has long been recognized as a problem in the Marrat reservoir in the Magwa field, Kuwait. One option of avoiding asphaltene problems in the reservoir, including the near wellbore region, is to maintain reservoir pressure and flowing BHPs above the asphaltene onset pressure (AOP). Given that there is a large pressure difference between AOP and the bubble point pressure and that natural flow is possible at pressure well below AOP, there may be economic benefits in operating the reservoir at pressures below AOP. Benefits relate the reduced and delayed costs of water injection facilities. There may also be some additional recovery related to fluid expansion. Potential problems relate to possible adverse changes to relative permeability due to asphaltene related wettability changes, productivity impairment due to near well-bore asphaltene deposition and increased asphaltene problems in the wellbore. The second and third of these potential problems have been assessed by a field trial. This paper describes the selection of a candidate well and the design of a field trial to assess these problems. The selected well was produced first with FBHP well above the AOP. Asphaltene deposition in the tubing was monitored, fluid samples were taken and pressure transient tests were performed to diagnose well inflow performance. No decline in well productivity was seen in this period. Asphaltene deposition in the tubing was a problem and the well required cleaning during this period. The well was then produced at high rate, with flowing BHP well below AOP and a similar surveillance program was carried out. Finally the well was returned to low rate production. Analysis of the data from the high rate and subsequent low rate production periods indicated that there had been a limited decrease in well productivity. These data also showed that asphaltene deposition in the tubing was less of a problem during the high rate test than during the preceding low rate test.