A field and circuit thermodynamics for integrative physiology. III. Keeping the books--a general experimental method.

Abstract

ARTICLESA field and circuit thermodynamics for integrative physiology. III. Keeping the books--a general experimental methodA. S. IberallA. S. IberallPublished Online:01 Mar 1978https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.1978.234.3.R85MoreSectionsPDF (4 MB)Download PDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesGet permissionsTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInWeChat Previous Back to Top Next Download PDF FiguresReferencesRelatedInformation Cited ByNovel molecular insights into ATP synthesis in oxidative phosphorylation based on the principle of least actionChemical Physics Letters, Vol. 796Inadequacies of the Computer MetaphorA Dynamical Basis for Action SystemsChapter IVa An Ecological Approach to Perception and ActionWhat muscle variable(s) does the nervous system control in limb movements?4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4A speech-motor-system perspective on nervous-system-control variables4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4Servos and regulators in the control of leg muscles4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4The stick insect as a model for muscle control4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4Force as the controlling muscle variable in limb movement4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4Are position-control systems active during leg movement of walking arthropods?4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4Does control of limb movement equal control of limb muscles?4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4Are whole muscles the fundamental substrate for the CNS control of movement?4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4Voluntary control of muscle length and tension, independently controlled variables, and invariant length–tension curves4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4Control theoretic concepts and motor control4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4Do force-measuring sense organs contribute to the reflex control of motor output in insects?4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4Multiple roles of muscular afferents4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4Force and stiffness: Further considerations4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4Central control and reflex regulation of mechanical impedance: The basis for a unified motor-control scheme4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4Moving with control: Using control theory to understand motor behavior4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4Respective roles of reflex-gain control and reprogramming in adaptive motor control4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4The role of proprioceptors and the adaptive control of limb movement4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4The CNS as a multivariable control system4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4Systems analysis in the study of the motor-control system: Control theory alone is insufficient4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4Motor control: Which themes do we orchestrate?4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4The motor system controls what it senses4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4How modest is the gain of the stretch reflex?4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4Tonic stretch reflex during voluntary activity4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4Reflex action in the context of motor control4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4How was movement controlled before Newton?4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4The importance of connective tissue within and between muscles4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4Control of limb movement without feedback from muscle afferents4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4Movement control: Signal or strategy?4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4Neurological ballistic movements: Sampled data or intermittent open-loop control4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4Motor equivalence and distributed control: Evidence for nonspecific muscle commands4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4Reductionism cannot answer questions of movement control4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4Must the nervous system be limited to afferent variables in the control of limb movement?4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4Movement control views: From diversity to unity4 February 2010 | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 4Systems Analysis of Hormone ActionPatterns of Human Interlimb Coordination Emerge from the Properties of Non-Linear, Limit Cycle Oscillatory ProcessesJournal of Motor Behavior, Vol. 13, No. 4 More from this issue > Volume 234Issue 3March 1978Pages R85-R97 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 1978 the American Physiological Societyhttps://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.1978.234.3.R85PubMed629372History Published online 1 March 1978 Published in print 1 March 1978 Metrics