Abstract
An Optimality Theoretic account of partial agreement (agreement with just one of multiple conjuncts) presented here explains typologically interrelated properties of partial agreement. For example, in languages such as Moroccan and Lebanese Arabic, partial agreement is optional, incompatible with anaphor binding, and limited to non-collective predication; in languages such as Welsh and Standard Arabic, it is obligatory, compatible with anaphor binding and free of semantic constraint on predication. These correlated properties are explained through the interaction of constraints requiring agreement with an NP's concord features and a distinct set of constraints requiring agreement with index features. Partial agreement is possible only when the optimal type of agreement (index agreement in some languages, concord agreement in others) cannot be satisfied by the conjoined phrase as a whole. Conjoined NPs lack concord features, so a constraint requiring agreement with concord features will oblige agreement with a conjunct that bears concord features. Conjoined NPs may lack index features (if they encode an exclusively non-collective referent set), but this lack of index will also entail partial agreement. Which of the conjuncts a verb agrees with is determined by alignment constraints favoring the conjunct that is linearly closest to the agreement target.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.