Abstract

To explore the necessity of Image Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC) adaptive radiation therapy (ART), and evaluate the consistency and robustness of auto re-planning during ART. Eleven NPC patients were enrolled in this study at one institution. We used a CT-integrated linear accelerator, which integrates a 16-slice helical CT to acquire diagnostic-grade fan-beam CT (FBCT) for IGRT. Electron density accuracy from FBCT provides a solid foundation for accurate radiation dose calculation. PGTVp, PTV1 and PTV2 prescription dose are 69.96 Gy, 60.06 Gy and 54.12 Gy with 33 fractions. All ROIs, including Targets and OARs, were auto delineated via a treatment planning system (TPS), and modified by a senior physician with more than 15-year experience to confirm that they follow the clinical requirement. An initial plan (Plan A) was automatically generated based on the first CT-Sim images on the TPS. Another adjusted re-plan (Plan B) was also automatically generated based on the second CT-Sim images after 20 fractions of treatment for ART implementation. During the whole course of the 33 fractions delivery, there are 20 fractions Plan A (with 4 weekly IGRTi, i = 1∼4) and 13 fractions Plan B (with 3 weekly IGRTj, j = 5∼7). After carefully rigid registration between the CT-Sim images and their following weekly FBCT images, we copied Plan A and Plan B to IGRTi and IGRTj, respectively. Plan_IGRT would be re-calculated for dose evaluation. In addition, the Plan A was copied to the second CT-Sim (Plan A_2nd CT-Sim) after first CT-Sim and second CT-Sim rigid images registration. There is a significant target volume change of -5%±4%, -3%±3%, and -5%±3% from Plan A to Plan B, for PGTVp, PTV1 and PTV2 (p<0.05), respectively. All the Plan A and Plan B could be generated within 210.2s±1.4s, which is more time-saving than manual planning greatly, and there is no statistical difference between Plan A and Plan B of the plan quality index (p>0.05). The plans for IGRT7 are inferior to the plans for IGRT5 with higher V110% for PGTVp (4.40%±8.60% for Plan A, 2.37%±8.91% for Plan B). PlanA_2nd CT-Sim for each patient is inferior to Plan B, with higher V110% for PGTVp (19.12%±18.91%), lower V100% for PTV2 (-2.84%±2.89%) and higher Dmax for Brainstem (315.88 cGy ± 190.39 cGy) statistically. Furthermore, all the Plan B_IGRTj are superior to Plan A_IGRTj, with the dose index difference of -17.50% ± 23.15%/-15.47% ± 14.85%, 2.45% ± 3.23%/2.31% ± 3.09% and -194.03 cGy ± 221.91 cGy/-170.07 cGy ± 168.41 cGy for V110% of PGTVp, V100% for PTV2 and Dmax of Brainstem for j = 5/7 (p<0.05), respectively. The world's first integrated CT-Linac platform, equipped with FBCT, can provide a diagnostic-quality FBCT for achieve offline ART. It is necessary for NPC patients to have the IGRT, ART and re-planning after 20 fractions treatment, for the target volumes change sharply. Auto planning and auto re-planning for NPC ART are able to maintain the plan consistency and robustness while shorten the planning time.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call