Abstract
This article aims to analyze the double procedural deadlines granted to the Public Treasury and demonstrate why this prerogative is currently inadequate. Therefore, this work used bibliographic and qualitative research on the doctrine, legislation and jurisprudence related to the subject, as well as quantitative research on statistical data from the National Council of Justice. Currently, given the computerization of institutions and the ease with which personal data can be found, the reasons why procedural deadlines were doubled have disappeared. In addition, there is a great concern with the balance of the civil procedure, making a more accentuated analysis of this scenario of disparities essential.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
