Abstract
This paper describes two simple tests that will characterize the hydrodynamics of a given phase system in a given CCC unit. Furthermore, it shows that, in practice, only one of these tests is necessary and the other can be predicted from the first. It goes on to show that retention information can be accurately obtained using a marker peak for the solvent front, so that both retention and resolution data can be collected in one simple test. While stationary phase retention (and, hence, peak elution) was found to behave quite predictably and could be modelled, resolution was not so predictable. Nevertheless, for analytical CCC, it was found that resolution of benzyl alcohol (BA) and p‐cresol (PC) only reduced from 2.3 to 1.4 as flow increased 7‐fold from 0.3 mL/min to 2 mL/min. Increasing the speed from 1000 to 2000 rpm (a 4× increase in “g” field) only increased the resolution a factor of 1.4×, whereas it was expected (from the number of mixing/settling cycles) to double. It is concluded that, for fast analytical CCC, it is worth running at as high a flow as possible (compensating for loss of resolution by increasing coil length) and increase speed only if it becomes necessary to obtain a reasonable retention.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
