A faint optical flash in dust-obscured GRB 080603A: implications for GRB prompt emission mechanisms

With the successful launch of the Swift Gamma-ray Burst Explorer, it is widely expected that the prompt optical flashes like GRB 990123 would be easily detected. However, the observations show that for a number of Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) no early optical flash has been detected, which indicates that the reverse shock emission must be suppressed. Here we explore the possibility that the optical flash may arise from the internal shock emission. For GRB 990123 and GRB 060111b, although their optical emission are not correlated with the gamma-ray emission, we propose here that their optical and gamma-ray emission may arise from different internal shocks (which can be formed by collision of different shells), and find that, under certain circumstances, the optical flashes of GRB 990123 and GRB 060111b can well be explained by the internal shock model. For GRB 041219a, the prompt optical emission was correlated with the gamma-ray emission, which can also be explained by the internal shock model if we assume the optical emission was the low-energy extension of the gamma-ray emission, and we find its redshift is about z similar to 0.2. As for GRB 050904, we have shown in previous paper that the optical flash was produced by synchrotron radiation and the X-ray flare was produced by the synchrotron-self-Compton (SSC) mechanism. Therefore we conclude that the early optical flashes of GRBs can usually arise from the internal shock emission. Meanwhile in our model since the shells producing the optical flashes would be easily disrupted by other shells, so we suggest that the bright optical flash should not be common in GRBs. In addition, we also discussed the SSC emission in the internal shock model, and find that for different values of parameters, there would be several kinds of high-energy emission (at similar to 100 keV, similar to 10 MeV or GeV) accompanying the optical flash. For a burst like GRB 990123, a GeV flare with fluence about 10(-8) erg cm(-2) s(-1) is expected, which might be detected by the GLAST satellite.

Two images on archival photographic plates which are most likely records of optical flashes from gamma-ray bursters (GRBs) were examined. One of these images appears on a 1901 plate in the field of the Nov. 5, 1979 GRB, while the other is in the field of the Jan. 13, 1979 GRB on a plate exposed in 1944. The 1901 optical transient image is circular in shape, while all normal star images are trailed by 8 in. No optical transients are found in a control region which is 34.3 times larger than the GRB error regions examined. Independent limits on the optical flash rate from the sky yield a probability of less than 0.0001 that any one of the optical transients is due to a background flash. A total exposure of 2.7 years was examined for GRB flashes at known GRB locations on the Harvard plates and a total of three GRB flashes were seen, that the average recurrence time scale for optical flashes is roughly one year. The optical fluence of these optical flashes was measured. For the three currently known GRB optical flashes, the ratio of gamma-ray fluence (from a modern burst) to the optical fluence (from a archival burst) were measured to be 800, 900, and 900.

From the small sample of afterglow lightcurves of short duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), the decays are rapid, roughly following a power-law in time. It has been assumed that the afterglow emission in short GRBs is collimated in jets in the same way as in long GRBs. An achromatic break in a short GRB afterglow lightcurve would therefore be strong evidence in favour of collimation in short GRBs. We examine the optical lightcurve of the afterglow of the short GRB 050709, the only short GRB where a jet break has been claimed from optical data. We show that (1) the decay follows a single power-law from 1.4 to 19 days after the burst and has a decay index alpha = 1.73_{-0.04}^{+0.11}, (2) that an optical flare at ~10 days is required by the data, roughly contemporaneous with a flare in the X-ray data, and (3) that there is no evidence for a break in the lightcurve. This means that so far there is no direct evidence for collimation in the outflows of short GRBs. The available limits on the collimation angles in short GRBs now strongly suggest much wider opening angles than found in long GRBs.

Correlations between optical flashes and gamma-ray emissions in gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) have been searched in order to clarify the question of whether these emissions occur at internal and/or external shocks. Among the most powerful GRBs ever recorded are GRB 080319B and GRB 130427A, which at early phases presented bright optical flashes possibly correlated with γ-ray components. Additionally, both bursts were fortuitously located within the field of view of the TeV γ-ray Milagro and HAWC observatories, and although no statistically significant excess of counts were collected, upper limits were placed on the GeV–TeV emission. Considering the synchrotron self-Compton emission from internal shocks and requiring the GeV–TeV upper limits, we found that the optical flashes and the γ-ray components are produced by different electron populations. Analyzing the optical flashes together with the multiwavelength afterglow observation, we found that these flashes can be interpreted in the framework of the synchrotron reverse shock model when outflows have arbitrary magnetizations.

Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. (will be inserted by hand later) arXiv:astro-ph/0504050v1 3 Apr 2005 A possible bright blue SN in the afterglow of GRB 020305 ⋆ J. Gorosabel 1,2 , J.P.U. Fynbo 3 , A. Fruchter 2 , A. Levan 4 , J. Hjorth 3 , P. Nugent 5 , A.J. Castro-Tirado 1 , J.M. Castro Cer´on 2,3 , J. Rhoads 2 , D. Bersier 2 , and I. Burud 2 Instituto de Astrof´isica de Andaluc´ia (IAA-CSIC), P.O. Box 03004, E-18080 Granada, Spain Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Juliane Maries Vej 30, DK-2100 Kobenhavn O, Denmark Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, MS 50-F, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA Received ; accepted Abstract. We report on ground-based and HST(+STIS) imaging of the afterglow and host galaxy of the Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) of March 5 2002. The GRB occurred in a R = 25.17 ± 0.14 galaxy, which apparently is part of an interacting system. The lightcurve of the optical afterglow shows a rebrightening, or at least a plateau, 12–16 days after the gamma-ray event. U BV RIK ′ multi-band imaging of the afterglow ∼12 days after the GRB reveals a blue spectral energy distribution (SED). The SED is consistent with a power-law with a spectral index of β = −0.63 ± 0.16, but there is tentative evidence for deviations away from a power-law. Unfortunately, a spectroscopic redshift has not been secured for GRB 020305. From the SED we impose a redshift upper limit of z . 2.8, hence excluding the pseudo redshift of 4.6 reported for this burst. We discuss the possibilities for explaining the lightcurve, SED and host galaxy properties for GRB 020305. The most natural interpretation of the lightcurve and the SED is an associated supernova (SN). Our data can not precisely determine the redshift of the GRB. The most favoured explanation is a low redshift (z ∼ 0.2) SN, but a higher redshift (z & 0.5) SN can not be excluded. We also discuss less likely scenarios not based on SNe, like a burst occurring in a z = 2.5 galaxy with an extinction curve similar to that of the Milky Way. Key words. gamma rays: bursts – techniques: photometric 1. Introduction For long duration GRBs the relation with supernovae (SNe) became firmly established with the discovery of the type Ic su- pernova SN 2003dh associated with GRB 030329 (Stanek et al. 2003; Hjorth et al. 2003). This result lends strong support to the collapsar model (Woosley 1993), but a SN is also an ingredient in other models (e.g. Dado et al. 2003; Fryer & Heger 2004). However, the associated SNe follow a broad distribution of op- tical luminosities (Zeh et al. 2004). Furthermore the connection of GRBs with SNe of other types than Ic can not be excluded, motivated by the two possible associations of GRBs and II type SNe (SN 1997cy, Germany et al. 2000; SN 1999E, Rigon et al. 2003). Therefore, the afterglow lightcurves and SEDs around the SN peak are far from being described by an universal SN template. In this study we present ground and space-based opti- cal observations of GRB 020305 carried out from 11.5 to 321.2 days after the burst. Send offprint requests to: J. Gorosabel Based on observations made with the Nordic Optical Telescope, operated on the island of La Palma jointly by Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden. Correspondence to: jgu@iaa.es GRB 020305 was localised by the HETE-II satellite on March 5.4968 UT (Ricker et al. 2002). The high-energy emis- sion as seen by the Interplanetary network (IPN) consisted in two broad pulses, with a total GRB duration of ∼280s (Hurley et al. 2002), placing it in the long-soft burst category. Price et al. (2002) reported the presence of a transient optical source in the HETE-II/IPN error box in images taken ∼20 hours after the GRB. Further imaging confirmed the fading behaviour of the candidate (Lee et al. 2002; Ohyama et al. 2002). The paper is structured as follows: Sect. 2 details the ob- servations and the data reduction, Sect. 3 reports the results on the SED, lightcurve and host galaxy, Sect. 4 discusses several interpretations of the results, and finally Sect. 5 draws the con- clusions of this study. 2. Observations and data reduction 2.1. NOT observations We observed the field of GRB 020305 from the ground with the 2.56-m Nordic Optical Telescope (NOT) on 2002 March 16.95–22.18 UT, i.e. 11.45–16.68 days after the GRB. The in- strument used was the Andaluc´ia Faint Object Spectrograph (ALFOSC) equipped with a 2048 2 pixel Loral CCD having a

The synchrotron optical flash caught in GRB 990123 overlaps with the MeV radiation front. Therefore, the optical-emitting electrons must also produce GeV-TeV emission by inverse Compton scattering of MeV photons. The ultra-high-energy flash can be much stronger than its optical counterpart. We also note that Compton cooling by MeV photons immediately terminates the optical emission unless the fireball Lorentz factor exceeds 103. Severe Compton losses may explain the nondetections of optical flashes in several long GRBs. Such failed optical flashes should be especially efficient GeV producers and likely to develop e± cascades. This probably happened in GRB 941017, and its mysterious high-energy component is well explained by Compton upscattering of GRB photons at the fireball deceleration radius. The proposed mechanism of GeV emission should not work for short GRBs that early decouple from the fireball and avoid interaction with the electrons in the deceleration flash. Observations by Swift and the Gamma-Ray Large Area Telescope will provide an opportunity to test these expectations. The existing data for GRB 990123 already impose interesting constraints on the explosion.

According to the internal-external shocks model for gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), the GRB is produced by internal shocks within a relativistic flow while the afterglow is produced by external shocks with the interstellar medium. We explore the early afterglow emission. For short GRBs the peak of the afterglow will be delayed, typically by few dozens of seconds after the burst. For long GRBs the early afterglow emission will overlap the GRB signal. We calculate the expected spectrum and the light curves of the early afterglow in the optical, X-ray, and gamma-ray bands. These characteristics provide a way to discriminate between late internal shocks emission (part of the GRB) and the early afterglow signal. If such a delayed emission, with the characteristics of the early afterglow, is detected, it can be used to prove the internal shock scenario as producing the GRB, as well as to measure the initial Lorentz factor of the relativistic flow. The reverse shock, at its peak, contains energy which is comparable to that of the GRB itself but has a much lower temperature than that of the forward shock so it radiates at considerably lower frequencies. The reverse shock dominates the early optical emission, and an optical flash brighter than 15th magnitude is expected together with the forward shock peak at X-rays or gamma-rays. If this optical flash is not observed, strong limitations can be put on the baryonic contents of the relativistic shell deriving the GRBs, leading to a magnetically dominated energy density.

In this presentation the main advances occurred in the past years concerning the observational features of Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) prompt event and afterglow polarization in the optical, as well as in other bands, are reviewed. Also, the observed cases of an `optical flash' simultaneous with the GRB itself are presented, along with their theoretical interpretation and the description of present and future observational fast-response techniques to chase this emission.

view Abstract Citations (15) References (16) Co-Reads Similar Papers Volume Content Graphics Metrics Export Citation NASA/ADS A Search for Optical Flares and Flashes with a Liquid-Mirror Telescope Content, R. ; Borra, E. F. ; Drinkwater, M. J. ; Poirier, S. ; Poisson, E. ; Beauchemin, M. ; Boily, E. ; Gauthier, A. ; Tremblay, L. M. Abstract Two liquid-mirror telescopes with 1.2 and 1 m diameters are used to search for optical phenomena in the sky with timescales less than 2 min. A total of 130 hr of usable data was obtained, but no events were observed. It is concluded that optical flashes and flares are rare events. Publication: The Astronomical Journal Pub Date: March 1989 DOI: 10.1086/115038 Bibcode: 1989AJ.....97..917C Keywords: Flares; Light Emission; Mirrors; Sky Surveys (Astronomy); Telescopes; Charge Coupled Devices; Flash; Liquid Phases; Astronomy; PHOTOMETRY full text sources ADS |

Prompt optical emission accompanying gamma-ray emission has been detected in several gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), and its origin is still under debate. A plausible interpretation is that the prompt optical emission is generated by internal shocks but from regions different from the prompt gamma-ray one. Based on this model, we investigate in detail the inverse Compton (IC) emission including the synchrotron self-Compton (SSC) and second inverse Compton (2IC) ones from the optical emission region. We expect that this study could provide a clue to the origin of prompt optical emission. We first explore the dependence of IC Y factor on some uncertain parameters such as the magnetic field equipartition factor and the Lorentz factor of GRB ejecta. The results indicate that the 2IC emission associated with strong optical flashes (such as GRB 080319b) may be easily detected by Fermi for general parameters. If the SSC peak energy is in the range of tens-to-hundreds keV but generally much weaker than the prompt gamma-ray emission, the component may be detectable by Swift (BAT). For moderately bright optical flashes, the 2IC emission is marginally detectable while the SSC is not. For weak optical flashes, both the 2IC and SSC components are undetectable. We then carry out a numerical calculation of the expected spectrum including synchrotron, SSC, and the 2IC emission for various parameters, which verifies the analytical results. Finally, taking GRB 080319b as an example, we make a simple case study. We find that the detection of the 2IC emission optical region by Fermi is promising. The future simultaneous detection of optical and high energy (MeV-GeV) from the emissions will possibly reveal the nature of the prompt optical emission and allow us to measure the quantities presently unknown such as the bulk Lorentz factor, radiative electrons energy, and magnetic field.

In this work we use gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglow spectra observed with the VLT/X-shooter spectrograph to measure rest-frame extinction in GRB lines-of-sight by modeling the broadband near-infrared (NIR) to X-ray afterglow spectral energy distributions (SEDs). Our sample consists of nine Swift GRBs, eight of them belonging to the long-duration and one to the short-duration class. Dust is modeled using the average extinction curves of the Milky Way and the two Magellanic Clouds. We derive the rest-frame extinction of the entire sample, which fall in the range $0 \lesssim {\it A}_{\rm V} \lesssim 1.2$. Moreover, the SMC extinction curve is the preferred extinction curve template for the majority of our sample, a result which is in agreement with those commonly observed in GRB lines-of-sights. In one analysed case (GRB 120119A), the common extinction curve templates fail to reproduce the observed extinction. To illustrate the advantage of using the high-quality X-shooter afterglow SEDs over the photometric SEDs, we repeat the modeling using the broadband SEDs with the NIR-to-UV photometric measurements instead of the spectra. The main result is that the spectroscopic data, thanks to a combination of excellent resolution and coverage of the blue part of the SED, are more successful in constraining the extinction curves and therefore the dust properties in GRB hosts with respect to photometric measurements. In all cases but one the extinction curve of one template is preferred over the others. We show that the modeled values of the extinction and the spectral slope, obtained through spectroscopic and photometric SED analysis, can differ significantly for individual events. Finally we stress that, regardless of the resolution of the optical-to-NIR data, the SED modeling gives reliable results only when the fit is performed on a SED covering a broader spectral region.

The reverse shock (RS) model is generally introduced to interpret the optical afterglows with the rapid rising and decaying, such as the early optical afterglow of GRB 990123 (which is also called the optical flash). In this paper, we collected 11 gamma-ray burst (GRB) early optical afterglows, which have signatures of dominant RS emission. Since the temporal slopes of the optical flashes are determined by both the medium density distribution index k and the electron spectral index p, we apply the RS model of the thin shell case to the optical flashes and determine the ambient medium of the progenitors. We find that the k value is in the range of 0–1.5. The k value in this paper is consistent with the result in Yi et al., where the forward shock model was applied to some onset bumps. However, the method adopted in this paper is only applicable to GRB afterglows with significant sharp rising and decaying RS emission. Our results indicate that the RS model can also be applied to confirm the circumburst medium, further implying that GRBs may have diverse circumburst media.

Gamma-ray burst (GRB) dust echoes were first proposed as an alternative explanation for the supernova-like (SN-like) components to the afterglows of GRB 980326 and GRB 970228. However, the spectroscopic identification of Type Ic SN 2003dh associated with GRB 030329, as well as the identification of SN-like components to the afterglows of other GRBs, appears to have confirmed the GRB/SN paradigm. However, the likely progenitors of Type Ic SNe are Wolf-Rayet WC stars, and late-type WC stars have been observed to be surrounded by dust, at a distance of 10^14 -- 10^15 cm from the star. Consequently, we revisit the possibility of GRB dust echoes, not on a timescale of weeks after the burst but on a timescale of minutes to hours. We find that if the optical flash is sufficiently bright and the jet sufficiently wide, GRB afterglows may be accompanied by chromatic variations on this timescale. From these signatures, such model parameters as the inner radius of the dust distribution, the initial opening angle of the jet, etc., may be deduced. With rapid and regular localizations of GRBs by HETE-2, Integral, and now Swift, and new and improved robotic telescope systems, these early-time GRB dust echoes may soon be detected. We describe one such robotic telescope system, called PROMPT, that the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill is building at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in greater detail.

Dark gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are sources with a low optical-to-X-ray flux ratio. Proposed explanations for this darkness are: i) the GRB is at high redshift ii) dust in the GRB host galaxy absorbs the optical/NIR flux iii) GRBs have an intrinsically faint afterglow emission. Within this framework, GRB 100614A and GRB 100615A are extreme. In fact, they are bright in the X-rays, but no optical/NIR afterglow has been detected for either source, despite several follow-up campaigns began early after the triggers. We build optical-to-X-ray spectral energy distributions (SEDs) at the times at which the reddest upper limits are available, and we model our SEDs with the extinction curves of the Milky Way (MW), Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC), and the attenuation curve obtained for a sample of starburst galaxies. We find that to explain the deepest NIR upper limits assuming either a MW or SMC extinction law, a visual extinction of AV > 50 is required, which is extremely unlikely. Since both GRBs are bright in X-rays, explanation iii) also cannot explain their dark classification, unless optical radiation and X-rays are not part of the same synchrotron spectrum. An alternative, or complementary explanation of the previous possibility, involves greyer extinction laws. A starburst attenuation curve gives AV>10, which is less extreme, despite still very high. Assuming high redshift in addition to extinction, implies an AV>10 at z=2 and AV>4-5 at z=5, regardless of the adopted extinction recipe. A different, exotic possibility would be an extremely high redshift origin (z>17 given the missing K detections). Population III stars are expected to emerge at z ~ 20 and can produce GRBs with energies well above those inferred for our GRBs at these redshifts. Mid- and far-IR observations of these extreme class of GRBs can help us to differentiate between the proposed scenarios.

Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) 201015A and 201216C are valuable cases where very-high-energy (VHE) gamma-ray afterglows have been detected. By analyzing their prompt emission data, we find that GRB 201216C is an extremely energetic, long GRB with a hard gamma-ray spectrum, while GRB 201015A is a relative subenergetic, soft-spectrum GRB. Attributing their radio–optical–X-ray afterglows to the synchrotron radiation of the relativistic electrons accelerated in their jets, we fit their afterglow lightcurves with the standard external shock model and infer their VHE afterglows from the synchrotron self-Compton scattering process of the electrons. It is found that the jet of GRB 201015A is midrelativistic (Γ0 = 44), surrounded by a very dense medium (n = 1202 cm−3), and the jet of GRB 201216C is ultrarelativistic (Γ0 = 331), surrounded by a moderate dense medium (n = 5 cm−3). The inferred peak luminosity of the VHE gamma-ray afterglows of GRB 201216C is approximately 10−9 erg cm−2 s−1 at 57–600 s after the GRB trigger, making it detectable with the MAGIC telescopes at a high confidence level, even though the GRB is at a redshift of 1.1. Comparing their intrinsic VHE gamma-ray lightcurves and spectral energy distributions with GRBs 180720B, 190114C, and 190829A, we show that their intrinsic peak luminosity of VHE gamma-ray afterglows at 104 s after the GRB trigger is variable from 1045 to 5 × 1048 erg s−1, and their kinetic energy, initial Lorentz factor, and medium density are diverse among bursts.