Abstract

Literature suggests that, as parents, people with intellectual disabilities experience disproportionately high rates of child removal compared to other groups. A factorial survey of 191 children’s social workers investigated the effect of disclosing parental intellectual disability (ID) upon risk assessments in a range of hypothetical child safeguarding scenarios. The case scenarios depicted a range of child safeguarding situations and parents’ ID status was randomly included as an additional item of information. The data were fitted into a generalised ordinal logistic regression model. Findings indicate that when presented with scenarios considered to be less risky, the parental ID disclosure contributed significantly to a higher risk assessment score. However, when presented with scenarios that were considered more risky, the additional parental ID disclosure did not significantly contribute to a higher score. These findings indicate that the risk associated with parental ID is not fixed but relative to the situation in which it is encountered. The research concludes that in cases of low risk, the effect of parental ID is identified as a support need, whereas the lesser contribution of the disclosure to assessments of higher risk cases may indicate that parental ID is overlooked.

Highlights

  • Decision-making by children’s social workers (CSWs) is affected by a wide range of factors, including their own individual heuristics, their personal values, the agency and legislative context, and characteristics of those with whom they have contact (Drury-Hudson, 1999)

  • Current literature suggests that parents with intellectual disability (ID) (PWID) are overrepresented in terms of the parents whose children are subject to child protection procedures and removed from their parents’ care

  • Due to the survey design, the ID and non-ID assessments were taken from the same participants and all participants assessed vignettes containing the same nine scenarios so there were no significant differences between the ID and non-ID groups

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Decision-making by children’s social workers (CSWs) is affected by a wide range of factors, including their own individual heuristics, their personal values, the agency and legislative context, and characteristics of those with whom they have contact (Drury-Hudson, 1999). Current literature suggests that parents with ID (PWID) are overrepresented in terms of the parents whose children are subject to child protection procedures and removed from their parents’ care. PWID are considered to be at risk of having their children removed It is not known how many PWID are living in England but people with ID represent approximately 2 per cent of the general population (Holland, 2011). Studies examining child protection procedure (Booth and Booth, 1996; McConnell and Llewellyn, 2000; Wates, 2002; Llewellyn et al, 2003; Booth et al, 2005) and the experiences of PWID (Booth and Booth, 2004; Baum and Burns, 2007; Gould and Dodd, 2014) suggest case outcomes and parents’ negative experiences may be due to discrimination by practitioners. Fear of discrimination has been cited as why PWID are wary of engaging with parental support services (Gould and Dodd, 2014)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call