Abstract
The article deals with proliferation of violations of ethical norms of science, that started to develop a few decades ago. It will be referred to as the The most important types of these violations are varieties of fraud (mainly falsification and fabrication of empirical data), and such forms of author misconduct as plagiarism, self-plagiarism, etc. The article is divided into six sections. In first, topic is introduced and some terminology clarified. In second, evidence is presented which corroborates existence of epidemic. The third deals with reaction to epidemic, by characterizing its dynamics in terms of being dominated by conflict between two positions: moralizing one - which promotes application of moralizing treatment to combat epidemic; and negationist one - which tends to deny existence of epidemic, and resists moralizing measures. The fourth explores causes of epidemic. A distinction is introduced between productivism and productionism, and an analysis is proposed of ways productivism fosters violations of ethical norms of science. The fifth consists of a critique of moralizing treatment, based on its inadequacies, mainly its inefficacy. The conclusion points to an alternative to moralizing treatment.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.