Abstract
The debate over legal requirements of a balanced federal budget has gained new life. A requirement would have strong implications for future fiscal policy. Done right, a requirement will allow Congress to combine a balanced budget with policy goals such as growth and full employment. Done wrong, the requirement can force Congress into a conflict between the balanced budget and other desirable policy goals. This paper explores the relation between a balanced-budget requirement and the structural budget deficit. A dynamic definition of the structural deficit is offered as an alternative to a traditional, static definition. The definition focuses on the performance of the economy, rather than its capacity utilization, a focus that ties the structure of the economy to the deficit via the ability of taxpayers to pay for long-term entitlement commitments.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.