Abstract
Material balance control is compared to conventional control via the use of dynamic distillation column simulations. The objective is to achieve dual composition control. Three towers ranging in purity and reflux ratio are considered. It is shown that material balance control is best for towers with the highest purities and reflux ratios. For towers with lower product purities and more moderate reflux ratios conventional control is better. The effect of the size of the analyser dead-time in determining which control strategy works best is also studied. The question of how to tune a material balance scheme as well as potential problems with the non material balance loop in such a scheme are treated.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.