Abstract

BackgroundEnhancing physical activity in overweight and obese individuals is an important means to promote health in this target population. The Health Action Process Approach (HAPA), which was the theoretical framework of this study, focuses on individual self-regulation variables for successful health behavior change. One key self-regulation variable of this model is action control with its three subfacets awareness of intentions, self-monitoring and regulatory effort. The social context of individuals, however, is usually neglected in common health behavior change theories. In order to integrate social influences into the HAPA, this randomized controlled trial investigated the effectiveness of a dyadic conceptualization of action control for promoting physical activity.Methods/DesignThis protocol describes the design of a single-blind randomized controlled trial, which comprises four experimental groups: a dyadic action control group, an individual action control group and two control groups. Participants of this study are overweight or obese, heterosexual adult couples who intend to increase their physical activity. Blocking as means of a gender-balanced randomization is used to allocate couples to conditions and partners to either being the target person of the intervention or to the partner condition. The ecological momentary intervention takes place in the first 14 days after baseline assessment and is followed by another 14 days diary phase without intervention. Follow-ups are one month and six months later. Subsequent to the six-months follow-up another 14 days diary phase takes place.The main outcome measures are self-reported and accelerometer-assessed physical activity. Secondary outcome measures are Body Mass Index (BMI), aerobic fitness and habitual physical activity.DiscussionThis is the first study examining a dyadic action control intervention in comparison to an individual action control condition and two control groups applying a single-blind randomized control trial. Challenges with running couples studies as well as advantages and disadvantages of certain design-related decisions are discussed. This RCT was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (PP00P1_133632/1) and was registered on 27/04/2012 at http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15705531.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-1321) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Enhancing physical activity in overweight and obese individuals is an important means to promote health in this target population

  • There is a plethora of research on health behavior change which is usually based on one of the leading social-cognitive models of health behavior, such as the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) [7], the Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) [8], Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) [9], or the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) [10]

  • Experimental group II: individual action control group After completing the assessments at the baseline session, target persons alone are instructed to form behavioral intentions to increase their physical activity to the recommended levels

Read more

Summary

Discussion

Regular physical activity in accordance to the recommendations of the WHO can have important health benefits, especially in overweight and obese individuals. By including another experimental group that only engages in goal setting but does not receive text messages with action control content Another challenge was the decision as to whether providing smartphones to the participants or to let them use their own smartphones. In line with common standards we recommend to abandon the strong focus on significance testing and to focus on effect sizes instead Despite these challenges outlined above in conducting studies with couples and applying ecological momentary interventions, we are convinced that this study will substantially further our knowledge with regard to social influences in health behavior change.

Background
Center of Disease Control
14. Bandura A
16. Gollwitzer PM
21. Karoly P
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call