Abstract

The robust performance of traditional partial least squares (PLS) method is poor because the objective function of PLS is to maximize the square of L <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> norm between the input and output data spaces, and this method is sensitive to outliers but insensitive to local features and causes nuisance alarms. Conversely, the L <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sub> norm can perfectly maintain the signal relative size in global statistical features extraction, and its feature extraction results are robust to outliers. Therefore, in this article a novel dual robustness projection to latent structure method, which includes the robustness of feature extraction and regression coefficients, based on the L <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sub> norm (L <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sub> -PLS) is proposed. Then, more attention is paid to the robustness of both the input and output spaces and the robustness relationship between those spaces in the dual robustness L <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sub> PLS method. The corresponding quality-relevant monitoring strategy is also established. Finally, the robustness of the L <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sub> -PLS method is illustrated with the Tennessee Eastman process simulation platform. The results show that the proposed method is insensitive to outliers and maintains the signal relative size, and the fault monitoring results are consistent with the actual situation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call