Abstract

In eukaryotes, the formation of a 5′-cap and 3′-poly(A) dependent protein–protein bridge is required for translation of its mRNAs. In contrast, several plant virus RNA genomes lack both of these mRNA features, but instead have a 3′-CITE (for cap-independent translation enhancer), a RNA element present in their 3′-untranslated region that recruits translation initiation factors and is able to control its cap-independent translation. For several 3′-CITEs, direct RNA-RNA long-distance interactions based on sequence complementarity between the 5′- and 3′-ends are required for efficient translation, as they bring the translation initiation factors bound to the 3′-CITE to the 5′-end. For the carmovirus melon necrotic spot virus (MNSV), a 3′-CITE has been identified, and the presence of its 5′-end in cis has been shown to be required for its activity. Here, we analyze the secondary structure of the 5′-end of the MNSV RNA genome and identify two highly conserved nucleotide sequence stretches that are complementary to the apical loop of its 3′-CITE. In in vivo cap-independent translation assays with mutant constructs, by disrupting and restoring sequence complementarity, we show that the interaction between the 3′-CITE and at least one complementary sequence in the 5′-end is essential for virus RNA translation, although efficient virus translation and multiplication requires both connections. The complementary sequence stretches are invariant in all MNSV isolates, suggesting that the dual 5′–3′ RNA:RNA interactions are required for optimal MNSV cap-independent translation and multiplication.

Highlights

  • Viral mRNAs have evolved numerous mechanisms for recruiting the host’s translational machinery, allowing them to compete with host mRNAs and avoid defense mechanisms that act at the level of translation

  • Cap-independent translation in some plant virus RNAs is facilitated by highly structured RNA elements residing within the 5 -untranslated region (5 -UTR), in some cases corresponding to internal ribosomal entry sites (IRES) (Kneller et al, 2006; Zhang et al, 2015; Miras et al, 2017a)

  • Based on their RNA structure, seven different types have been identified to date, all in viruses belonging to the family Tombusviridae: BTE-like, TED-like, PTElike, Y-shaped (YSS), I-shaped (ISS), T-shaped (TSS), and CXTE-like 3 -CITEs (Nicholson and White, 2011; Simon and Miller, 2013; Truniger et al, 2017)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Viral mRNAs have evolved numerous mechanisms for recruiting the host’s translational machinery, allowing them to compete with host mRNAs and avoid defense mechanisms that act at the level of translation. 3 -CITEs bind host translation initiation factor eIF4F, as shown for the TED-like (Gazo et al, 2004), YSS (Nicholson et al, 2013), ISS (Nicholson et al, 2010; Miras et al, 2017b), PTElike (Batten et al, 2006; Wang et al, 2009, 2011) and BTE-like (Treder et al, 2008; Kraft et al, 2013) 3 -CITEs These results and the observation that several 3 -CITEs continued facilitating cap-independent translation in vitro when moved to the 5 terminus of viral RNAs, thereby replacing their endogenous 5 -UTR (Meulewaeter et al, 1998b; Guo et al, 2000), suggest that the 3 -CITE must be responsible for recruiting the host factors involved in translation initiation and that these must be delivered to the 5 -end near the start codon. Often the presence of both genome ends has been shown to be essential for cap-independent translation (Truniger et al, 2017)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call