A Dry Hole or Reservoir Damage? What We Need to Know: ABSTRACT

Abstract

Stories abound in the industry about the oil or gas field drilled and abandoned by one company, only to be discovered by a second company that evaluated the data from a different perspective. The Elmworth field (Canada), and Beeville, North Resenberg, and Running Duke fields (Texas) are all examples where the initial well penetrated the hydrocarbon column but was not completed, or was completed, tested, and abandoned. Numerous explanations exist as to why fields are abandoned and then rediscovered. Often contributing to this cycle is a lack of understanding of the reservoir's pore geometry, and of the effects of drilling or completion-induced damage on production or pressure performance measured by drill-stem tests, repeat formation testers, and well logs. Additionally, the inability to tell the difference between a low-permeability noncommercial reservoir and a damaged commercial reservoir results in a lot of missed field discoveries. In my lecture, I discuss the causes of formation damage, as well as factors that signal the reservoir's vulnerability to damage (e.g., small pore throats, authigenic clays, low reservoir pressure). I also include case examples of conventional tests that, by routine analysis, show the zone to be noncommercial when, in fact, the well was completed and produced commercially. Understanding the type of reservoir system being tested and using all available tools and data are the key to determining reservoir behavior. End_of_Article - Last_Page 1440------------