Abstract
Background This study compares two groups of patients with acute aortic dissection type A in whom two different techniques of anastomotic reinforcement were used, and evaluates the impact of these two techniques on perioperative blood loss and surgical outcome. Methods One hundred eighty-five consecutive patients with acute aortic dissection type A between 1998 and 2002 were grouped according to the technique utilized for reinforcing the aortic anastomotic site. Group A consisted of 21 patients in whom a novel double patch sandwich technique was used, whereas in group B (164 patients) conventional Teflon felt strips served as reinforcement. Results Preoperative profiles were comparable for both groups. Deep hypothermia and circulatory arrest were used in 180 patients (97%). Retrograde cerebral perfusion and retrograde cardioplegia were used in 70 patients (38%). Hospital mortality for the two groups was 4.7% (1 of 21) and 18% (29 out of 164), p < 0.30, respectively. On average 2 versus 6 U of PRBC ( p < 0.21), and 3 versus 5 U of FFP ( p < 0.004) were given during operation in groups A and B, respectively, and indicates reduced suture line bleeding in group A. Conclusions Modifications in the surgical technique for repair of acute aortic dissection type A, and in anastomotic reinforcement in particular, may lead to substantial reduction of suture line bleeding and diminished blood loss and transfusion requirements, and favorably affects patient outcome. Nevertheless, continued effort is mandatory to further enhance surgical outcome in this patient population.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.