Abstract
Research on visuomotor control suggests that visually guided actions toward objects rely on functionally distinct computations with respect to perception. For example, a double dissociation between grasping and between perceptual estimates was reported in previous experiments that pit real against illusory object size differences in the context of the Ponzo illusion. While most previous research on the relation between action and perception focused on one-handed grasping, everyday visuomotor interactions also entail the simultaneous use of both hands to grasp objects that are larger in size. Here, we examined whether this double dissociation extends to bimanual movement control. In Experiment 1, participants were presented with different-sized objects embedded in the Ponzo Illusion. In Experiment 2, we tested whether the dissociation between perception and action extends to a different illusion, the Wundt–Jastrow illusion, which has not been previously used in grasping experiments. In both experiments, bimanual grasping trajectories reflected the differences in physical size between the objects; At the same time, perceptual estimates reflected the differences in illusory size between the objects. These results suggest that the double dissociation between action and perception generalizes to bimanual movement control. Unlike conscious perception, bimanual grasping movements are tuned to real-world metrics, and can potentially resist irrelevant information on relative size and depth.
Highlights
Object location Object size Experiment 1 Experiment 2Grasping Grasping control Manuel estimations Grasping Manuel estimationsThe main effect of size was not significant [F(1,25) = 0.92, p = 0.3]
As can be seen in the figure, a dissociable pattern of performance was obtained for grasping grip apertures and for perceptual estimates of size
The maximum grip aperture (MGA) was larger for an object that was perceived as smaller (253, 260 mm, for the short and large objects, respectively)
Summary
The design of Experiment 1b was similar to the one used in Experiment 1a (illusory background condition), except that the participants estimated the sizes of objects by manually adjusting the distance between their fingers following the opening of the goggles. There were eight additional incongruent catch trials in which the physically shorter object was placed together with a noticeably larger object, 24.5 cm in length In this configuration, the illusory background did not lead to reversal of the perceived size differences. As in Ganel et al.’s18 study, in order to disentangle the effects of apparent and real size on grip apertures, we focused our analysis on the subset of trials in which the participants erroneously judged the object as shorter/longer due to the illusion.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.