Abstract

1054 Background: This international trial studied the efficacy and safety of Cap plus Enz in treating advanced BrCa. Methods: Eligible pts (advanced BrCa, prior anthracycline and taxanes, ≤2 prior chemotherapy regimens and performance status ≤2) were randomized to 1250 mg/m2 Cap (days 1 to 14) and a loading dose of 1125 mg Enz on day 1 of Cycle 1 preceding daily 500 mg Enz (Cap-E) or daily placebo (Cap-P) as continuous oral 21-day cycle treatment. Pts discontinued due to progression, death, or adverse event (AE). Response was assessed before alternate cycles. The primary endpoint, progression-free survival (PFS), was compared between arms using log-rank test. Planned enrollment of 60 pts/study arm provided 80% power to detect a 40% PFS improvement with Cap-E over Cap-P (1-sided type-I error=0.20). Results: Prespecified efficacy and safety conditions were not met in a planned interim analysis and the study was terminated. All data from study enrollment to termination were analyzed. 85 pts were randomized (Cap-E, n=42; Cap-P, n=43; median age, 54.2 years) and received ≥1 study drug dose. There were no statistically significant differences between Cap-E and Cap-P, respectively, in PFS (median [95% CI]=2.8 months [2.1, 4.6] versus 4.3 months [2.9, 6.2]; log-rank p=0.237), overall survival (median [95% CI]=9.9 months [7.0, 16.6] versus 14.9 months [9.9, 19.3); log-rank p=0.181), best overall response (11.9% versus 11.6%; Fisher's Exact p=1.00) or duration of response (median [95% CI]=4.3 months [2.2, 4.3] versus 3.5 months [2.8, N/A]; log-rank p=0.812). More Cap-E than Cap-P pts, respectively, experienced ≥1 drug-related (d-r) Grade 3/4 toxicity (42.9% versus 32.6%), d-r serious AE (16.7% versus 14.0%) and d-r hospitalization (14.3% versus 9.3%). Fewer Cap-E (9.5%) than Cap-P pts (11.6%) discontinued due to d-r AEs. There were 4 study d-r deaths (Cap-E, n=2; Cap-P, n=2) on therapy or within 30 days of study treatment discontinuation. Conclusions: When compared with Cap-P, Cap-E did not improve survival outcomes and increased d-r toxicity. These data do not support use of Cap-E in this patient population. Author Disclosure Employment or Leadership Position Consultant or Advisory Role Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Funding Expert Testimony Other Remuneration Lilly Lilly Lilly Lilly, Roche Lilly

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.