Abstract

Summary Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) and nucleotide‐binding domain and leucine‐rich repeat (LRR)‐containing proteins (NLRs) initiate pattern‐triggered immunity (PTI) and effector‐triggered immunity (ETI), respectively, each associated with the activation of an overlapping set of defence genes. The regulatory mechanism behind this convergence of PTI‐ and ETI‐mediated defence gene induction remains elusive.We generated transgenic Arabidopsis plants that enable conditional NLR activation without pathogen infection to dissect NLR‐ and PRR‐mediated transcriptional signals. A comparative analysis of over 40 transcriptome datasets linked calmodulin‐binding transcription activators (CAMTAs) to the activation of overlapping defence genes in PTI and ETI. We used a dominant camta3 mutant (camta3‐D) to assess CAMTA functions in the corresponding transcriptional regulation.Transcriptional regulation by NLRs, although highly similar to PTI responses, can be established independently of pathogen‐associated molecular pattern (PAMP) perception, defence phytohormones and host cell death. Conditional expression of the N‐terminal coiled‐coil domain of the barley MLA (Mildew resistance locus A) NLR is sufficient to trigger similar transcriptional reprogramming as full‐length NLRs. CAMTA‐binding motifs are overrepresented in the 5′ regulatory regions of the identified primary immune response genes, consistent with their altered expression and disease resistance responses in camta3‐D plants.We propose that CAMTA‐mediated transcriptional regulation defines an early convergence point in NLR‐ and PRR‐mediated signalling.

Highlights

  • Plants, unlike higher vertebrates, lack an adaptive immune system and rely on innate immunity to suppress pathogen growth

  • We provide evidence that calmodulin-binding transcription activators (CAMTAs) contribute to primary transcriptional responses in both pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI), and these are tightly associated with pattern recognition receptors (PRRs)- and NLR-mediated disease

  • Conditional RPS4 activation is achieved by shifting plants that constitutively express the receptor from 28°C to 19°C, thereby triggering transcriptional changes in the absence of a pathogen (Heidrich et al, 2013)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Unlike higher vertebrates, lack an adaptive immune system and rely on innate immunity to suppress pathogen growth. The activation of a PRR by a P/MAMP is sufficient to induce defence responses limiting pathogen growth, and this mechanism is designated pattern-triggered immunity (PTI). Key components of intracellular non-self detection are a family of nucleotide-binding domain and leucine-rich repeat (LRR)containing proteins (NLRs). These NLRs typically detect the presence or action of strain-specific pathogen effectors, called avirulence (Avr) effectors (Jones et al, 2016). The activation of effector-triggered immunity (ETI) by NLRs suppresses pathogen growth. As infection attempts by avirulent pathogens normally co-activate ETI and PTI, it is difficult to disentangle the relative contributions of PRR- and NLR-derived signals to immune outputs

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.