Abstract

Inevitable tumor recurrence and a poor median survival are frustrating reminders of the inefficacy of our current standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM), which includes surgery followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy with the DNA alkylating agent temozolomide. Because resistance to genotoxic damage is achieved mainly through execution of the DNA damage response (DDR) and DNA repair pathways, knowledge of the changes in DNA repair and cell-cycle gene expression that occur during tumor development might help identify new targets and improve treatment. Here, we performed a gene expression analysis targeting components of the DNA repair and cell-cycle machineries in cohorts of paired tumor samples (i.e., biopsies from the same patient obtained at the time of primary tumor operation and at recurrence) from patients treated with radiotherapy or radiotherapy plus temozolomide. We identified and validated a 27-gene signature that resulted in the classification of GBM specimens into three groups, two of which displayed inverse expression profiles. Each group contained primary and recurrent samples, and the tumor at relapse frequently displayed a gene expression profile different from that of the matched primary biopsy. Within the groups that exhibited opposing gene expression profiles, the expression pattern of the gene signature at relapse was linked to progression-free survival. We provide experimental evidence that our signature exposes group-specific vulnerabilities against genotoxicants and inhibitors of the cell cycle and DDR, with the prospect of personalized therapeutic strategies.Significance: These findings suggest that classification of GBM tumors based on a DNA repair and cell-cycle gene expression signature exposes vulnerabilities to standard-of-care therapies and offers the potential for personalized therapeutic strategies.

Highlights

  • Despite surgical resection and genotoxic treatment with ionizing radiation (IR) and the DNA alkylating agent temozolomide, glioblastoma (GBM) remains one of the most lethal cancers

  • Because of the nCounter gene expression format, we focused on 154 genes encompassing the major DNA repair pathways: base excision repair (BER), nucleotide excision repair (NER), mismatch repair (MMR), homologous recombination (HR), nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), direct repair enzymes (e.g., methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT)), Fanconi anemia (FA), as well as a selection of genes encoding effectors and regulators of cell cycle, DNA replication, DNA damage response (DDR), centromere, and centrosome dynamics (Supplementary Table S2)

  • Given the inverse gene expression profile displayed by the G1 and G3 groups and the large number of genes involved in cell cycle and mitosis regulation in our signature, including MKI67 encoding the proliferation marker Ki-67, we further investigated the expression of this marker at the protein level

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite surgical resection and genotoxic treatment with ionizing radiation (IR) and the DNA alkylating agent temozolomide, glioblastoma (GBM) remains one of the most lethal cancers. Resistance to chemoradiation is promoted by complex DNA repair mechanisms, Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/). Including O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), which mediates the direct removal of O6-methylguanine (O6meG), the most cytotoxic lesion induced by temozolomide. In the absence of MGMT, processing of O6-meG by the mismatch repair (MMR) pathway leads to perturbations of the replication fork and double-stranded DNA breaks (DSB) that require complex machineries for their repair. The other lesions induced by temozolomide are repaired mainly through base excision repair (BER) or direct removal mechanisms catalyzed by the DNA demethylases ALKBH2/3 The other lesions induced by temozolomide are repaired mainly through base excision repair (BER) or direct removal mechanisms catalyzed by the DNA demethylases ALKBH2/3 (reviewed in ref. 4)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.