Abstract
Abstract1bis paper is intended to show the incorrect uses of archaeological documents to legitimise current political positions. In accordance with these aims, a better knowledge of poorly known archaeological concepts is proposed to guard against such wrong practices. Concepts such as 'ethnic groups' will, of course, remain in use regardless of these considerations. 1bis question is discussed from two different viewpoints: the dialectic relationship between the prevailing history and 'intrahistory', and the relationship between the individual aristocratic power and the power held by communities or rural groups during the Iron Age in Europe.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
