Abstract

Dispersants have been used with mixed success since the Torrey Canyon incident in 1967. Although in recent years the use of mechanical recovery methods has been increasing, dispersants still continue to be the main method ofpollution control in many countries. This paper presents a discussion on the limitations of dispersants and provides criteria for determining whether the dispersant approach will provide an acceptable means of treating a particular spill. It concludes that, non-spreading high viscosity oils, water-in-oil emulsions and oil slicks in the final phases of spreading, i.e. very thin slicks, are effectively non treatable with dispersants. It also suggests that as an alternative to dispersant treatment for dispersible oils, consideration should be given to increasing natural dispersion rates by agitation from the passage of boats through the slicks.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.