Abstract

In this paper, we study the role of law for squaring democracy with a market-based financial order. We approach this issue on the basis of Jurgen Habermas’ discourse theoretical understanding of the role of law in the welfare state. Accordingly, law needs to be enforceable; law-making and law-application need to be institutionally separated; and public law needs to be distinguishable from private law. The contemporary practice of sovereign debt restructuring reveals some empirical and normative challenges to this understanding of the law. These findings inform our proposals for conceptual and institutional improvements that might lead to a more harmonious relation between democracy and financial order. In particular, we argue that a discourse theoretical understanding should tap on the legitimating potential of existing transnational discourses that are characterized by cross-border cleavages in public discourse.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call