Abstract

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to develop a DTI-based method to quantitatively assess fiber angles and changes therein in leg muscles in order to facilitate longitudinal studies on muscle fiber architectural adaptations in healthy subjects.MethodsThe upper legs of five volunteers were scanned twice on the same day. The right lower legs of five volunteers were scanned twice with the ankle in three positions, i.e. -15° dorsiflexion, 0° neutral position, and 30° plantarflexion. The MRI protocols consisted of a noise scan, a 3-point mDixon scan and a DTI scan. Fiber-angle color maps were generated for four muscles in the upper legs and two muscles in the lower leg. Voxel-wise fiber angles (θ) were calculated from the angle between the principal eigenvector of the diffusion tensor and a reference line defined between the origo and insertion points of each muscle. Bland-Altman analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV%), minimal detectable change (MDC), standard error (SE) and Friedman test were used for assessing the feasibility of this method and in order to have an indication of the repeatability and the sensitivity.ResultsBland-Altman analysis showed good repeatability (CV%<10 and 0.7≤ICC≤0.9) with exception of the Tibialis Anterior (TA) muscle in dorsiflexion position(CV%: 12.2) and the Semitendinosus (ST) muscle (left leg) (CV%: 11.4). The best repeatability metrics were found for the SOL muscle in neutral position (CV%: 2.6). Changes in average θ in TA and SOL with ankle positions were observed in accordance with expected agonist and antagonist functions of both muscles. For example, for the anterior left compartment the change in fiber angle Δθ with respect to the neutral position Δθ = -1.6° ± 0.8° and 2.2° ± 2.8° (p = 0.008), for dorsiflexion and plantarflexion, respectively.ConclusionOur method facilitates fast inspection and quantification of muscle fiber angles in the lower and upper leg muscles in rest and detection of changes in lower-leg muscle fiber angles with varying ankle angles.

Highlights

  • Muscle fiber architecture is a dominant determinant of muscle functioning in terms of tension, exertable force, response to physical exercise, as well as vulnerability to muscle injury and disease [1]

  • Bland-Altman analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV%), minimal detectable change (MDC), standard error (SE) and Friedman test were used for assessing the feasibility of this method and in order to have an indication of the repeatability and the sensitivity

  • Less common in clinical practice but very useful in biomechanics for the estimation of muscle force are the definitions of pennation angle in three-dimensional volume, in which the pennation angle is defined between the muscle fascicles and the line of action of the muscle [5] which in turn can be subject to different definitions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Muscle fiber architecture is a dominant determinant of muscle functioning in terms of tension, exertable force, response to physical exercise, as well as vulnerability to muscle injury and disease [1]. The most commonly used definition of pennation angle is the two dimensional (2D) pennation angle between the muscle fascicles and the aponeurosis or tendon [4] in a specific location of the muscle. Another used definition of pennation angle in 2D is the angle between the muscle fascicles and the line of action of the tendon [4]. Less common in clinical practice but very useful in biomechanics for the estimation of muscle force are the definitions of pennation angle in three-dimensional volume, in which the pennation angle is defined between the muscle fascicles and the line of action of the muscle [5] which in turn can be subject to different definitions. The purpose of this study was to develop a DTI-based method to quantitatively assess fiber angles and changes therein in leg muscles in order to facilitate longitudinal studies on muscle fiber architectural adaptations in healthy subjects

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.